The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A computer‐assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Photographic mark–recapture is a cost‐effective, non‐invasive way to study populations. However, to efficiently apply photographic mark–recapture to large populations, computer software is needed for image manipulation and pattern matching. 2. We created an open‐source application for the storage, pattern extraction and pattern matching of digital images for the purposes of mark–recapture analysis. The resulting software package is a stand‐alone, multiplatform application implemented in Java. Our program employs the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) operator that extracts distinctive features invariant to image scale and rotation. 3. We applied this system to a population of Masai giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi) in the Tarangire Ecosystem in northern Tanzania. Over 1200 images were acquired in the field during three primary sampling periods between September 2008 and December 2009. The pattern information in these images was extracted and matched resulting in capture histories for over 600 unique individuals. 4. Estimated error rates of the matching system were low based on a subset of test images that were independently matched by eye. 5. Encounter histories were subsequently analysed with open population models to estimate apparent survival rates and population size. 6. This new open‐access tool allowed photographic mark–recapture to be applied successfully to this relatively large population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176 · cited 1×
“PMR has been employed particularly in the studies of relatively small populations of marine mammals and mammalian terrestrial predators (e.g. Karanth & Nichols 1998; Forcada & Aguilar 2000; Langtimm 2004; Silver et al. 2004).”
ARZOUMANIAN, Z., HOLMBERG, J., & NORMAN, B. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01117.x · Cited by 316
Cited by
A computer vision for animal ecology
Weinstein, B. G. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12780 · Cited by 429
Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance
Kühl, H. S., & Burghardt, T. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.013 · Cited by 189
The potential for acoustic individual identification in mammals
Linhart, P., Mahamoud-Issa, M., Stowell, D., & Blumstein, D. T. (2022) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00222-2 · Cited by 39
Assessing rotation-invariant feature classification for automated wildebeest population counts
Torney, C. J., Dobson, A. P., Borner, F., Lloyd-Jones, D. J., Moyer, D., Maliti, H. T., Mwita, M., Fredrick, H., Borner, M., & Hopcraft, J. G. C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156342 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolger, D. T., Morrison, T. A., Vance, B., Lee, D., & Farid, H.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 813-822
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108570180
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A computer‐assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00212.x
- The paper
- Bolger, D. T., Morrison, T. A., Vance, B., Lee, D., & Farid, H. (2012). A computer‐assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00212.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.