Cited by 189Morphological variations and asymmetryWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance

Kühl, Hjalmar S., Burghardt, Tilo·2013·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Animal biometrics is an emerging field that develops quantified approaches for representing and detecting the phenotypic appearance of species, individuals, behaviors, and morphological traits. It operates at the intersection between pattern recognition, ecology, and information sciences, producing computerized systems for phenotypic measurement and interpretation. Animal biometrics can benefit a wide range of disciplines, including biogeography, population ecology, and behavioral research. Currently, real-world applications are gaining momentum, augmenting the quantity and quality of ecological data collection and processing. However, to advance animal biometrics will require integration of methodologies among the scientific disciplines involved. Such efforts will be worthwhile because the great potential of this approach rests with the formal abstraction of phenomics, to create tractable interfaces between different organizational levels of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.013

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The measures yielded by this conversion are sometimes referred to as animal biometrics.

    “The measures yielded by this conversion, reviewed in this section, are also sometimes referred to as animal biometrics93.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • As an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals.

    “As an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals10,93.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • The standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations.

    “The standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling97, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations54,93.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kühl, H. S., & Burghardt, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Kühl, Hjalmar S.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
432-441
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032593695
Cited by
189
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Bristol
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E500110/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
animal biometrics, phenomics, phenotypic measurement, morphological characters, pattern recognition, biogeography, population ecology, animal behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Biometry, Ecology, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Phenotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review