Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Negative self‐schemata in clinical depression

Bradley, Brendan, Mathews, Andrew·1983·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Predictions from a negative self‐schema model of depression were tested using decision speed and recall measures for self and other person‐referent positive and negative adjectives. Clinical depressives, compared to non‐psychiatric controls, recalled more negative than positive self‐referent adjectives, although there were no differences between groups in decision speed. Depressives' negative bias in recall applied only to the self‐referent conditions; in the other referent conditions they exhibited the normal tendency towards positive recall bias. The self‐referent recall bias in depressives did not relate significantly to either duration or intensity of depression. The results appear to be consistent with expectations derived from a negative self‐schema model of depression, but alternative explanations remain to be investigated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00598.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Bradley, B., & Mathews, A.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
173-181
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2040391573
Cited by
264
References
0
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negative self‐schemata in clinical depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00598.x
The paper
Bradley, B., & Mathews, A. (1983). Negative self‐schemata in clinical depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00598.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.