Cited by 1,361Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis

Symons, Cynthia S., Johnson, Blair T.·1997·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

In this review, the authors examine the basis for the mnemonic superiority that results from relating material to the self. A meta-analysis confirms the expected self-reference effect (SRE) in memory, with self-referent encoding strategies yielding superior memory relative to both semantic and other-referent encoding strategies. Consistent with theory and research that suggest self-reference (SR) produces both organized and elaborate processing, the SRE was smaller (a) when SR is compared with other-reference (OR) rather than semantic encoding and (b) when the comparison tasks promote both organization and elaboration. Thus, the SRE appears to result primarily because the self is a well-developed and often-used construct that promotes elaboration and organization of encoded information. The authors discuss the implications of these and other findings for theories of the SRE and for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T.
Affiliations
Houghton University (US)
Corresponding author
Symons, Cynthia S.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1997
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
371-394
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2167106897
Cited by
1,361
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 53
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Syracuse University
  • National Institutes of Health (7k21mh001377-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH01377-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
self-reference effect, semantic encoding, elaborative processing, information organization, encoding strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Self Concept, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review