Cited by 34Child Abuse and TraumaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Reported sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology among women attending psychology clinics: The mediating role of dissociation

Ross‐Gower, Jo, Waller, Glenn, Tyson, Mary, Elliott, Peter·1998·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective While there is now a good clinical research base that outlines the links between reported sexual abuse and psychological symptoms and disorders, there is less of an understanding of the psychological processes mediating that relationship. This study assessed the role of dissociation as a mediator between reported sexual abuse and a range of psychopathological characteristics. Design A patient-series design was used. Method Participants were an unselected sample of 45 women attending clinical psychology services. Each woman was interviewed regarding a reported history of sexual abuse, and completed standardized measures of general psychopathology, borderline personality disorder characteristics and dissociation. Results Sexual abuse per se was associated with the extent of depression, somatization, compulsive behaviour, phobic symptoms and borderline personality disorder characteristics. In each case, dissociation served as a complete mediator in that link. However, the same mediating relationship was not found when attempting to explain the greater psychopathological impact of more 'severe' forms of abuse (childhood experiences; intra-familial abuse). Conclusion These findings suggest that the effective of clinical work with these psychopathological features would be enhanced if dissociation symptoms were addressed in women with a reported history of sexual abuse. However, the importance of that therapeutic target may be unrelated to the severity of the psychologica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01388.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research in BPD has found reasonably strong relationships between dissociation and childhood trauma, especially sexual abuse, physical abuse, attachment difficulties, and parental neglect.

    “Research in BPD has found reasonably strong relationships between dissociation and childhood trauma, especially sexual abuse [118, 121–124], physical abuse, attachment difficulties, and parental neglect [118, 125, 126]”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross‐Gower, J., Waller, G., Tyson, M., & Elliott, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Waller, Glenn
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
313-326
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W1966616992
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
child sexual abuse, dissociation, psychopathology, borderline personality disorder, depression, somatization, compulsive behaviour, phobic symptoms, intrafamilial abuse, abuse severity, women, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review