The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*
Abstract
S ummary . This paper describes an attempt to identify different levels of processing of information among groups of Swedish university students who were asked to read substantial passages of prose. Students were asked questions about the meaning of the passages and also about how they set about reading the passages. This approach allows processes and strategies of learning to be examined, as well as the outcomes in terms of what is understood and remembered. The starting point of this research was that learning has to be described in terms of its content. From this point differences in what is learned, rather than differences in how much is learned, are described. It was found that in each study a number of categories (levels of outcome) containing basically different conceptions of the content of the learning task could be identified. The corresponding differences in level of processing are described in terms of whether the learner is engaged in surface‐level or deep‐level processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
Biggs, J. (1996) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138871 · Cited by 4,084
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269
The revised two‐factor Study Process Questionnaire: R‐SPQ‐2F
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709901158433 · Cited by 2,122
Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34085991 · Cited by 1,810
What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning
Biggs, J. (1999) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436990180105 · Cited by 1,332
Metadata
- Authors
- MARTON, F., & SÄLJÖ, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-11
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W1975912968
- Cited by
- 4,608
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- The paper
- MARTON, F., & SÄLJÖ, R. (1976). ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.