Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

INFERENTIAL AND MEMORY SKILLS IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF STORIES

Open access
OAKHILL, JANE·1984·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

S ummary . An experiment was carried out to investigate 7–8 year‐olds' use of implicit inferences in understanding stories. Two groups of children, differentiated by their ability at text comprehension, read four short stories and were asked a series of questions after each one. The results showed that skilled readers were better than less skilled readers at answering questions from memory shortly after reading a story, both when the questions could be answered directly from the text, and when they required an inference. However, when the text was made available, the less skilled group remained poorer at answering questions that required an inference, although their performance on literal questions improved to the same level as that of the skilled group. Thus, the experiment supports the idea that a major distinguishing characteristic of skilled readers is that they are good at making inferences, which enable them to relate the ideas in a text one to another and to general knowledge. Additionally, the results provide no support for the claim that differences in ability to make inferences can be attributed to differences in memory for prose: the less skilled group were poorer at making inferences even when the text was available to them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
OAKHILL, J.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
31-39
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W2136387403
Cited by
273
References
0
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.