Cited by 1,496Reading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills.

Open access
Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, Bryant, Peter·2004·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The authors report data from a longitudinal study that addresses the relations between working memory capacity and reading comprehension skills in children aged 8, 9, and 11 years. At each time point, the authors assessed children’s reading ability, vocabulary and verbal skills, performance on 2 working memory assessments (sentence-span and digit working memory), and component skills of comprehen-sion. At each time point, working memory and component skills of comprehension (inference making, comprehension monitoring, story structure knowledge) predicted unique variance in reading compre-hension after word reading ability and vocabulary and verbal ability controls. Further analyses revealed that the relations between reading comprehension and both inference making and comprehension monitoring were not wholly mediated by working memory. Rather, these component skills explained their own unique variance in reading comprehension. Text comprehension is a complex task that draws on many different cognitive skills and processes. Unfortunately, our knowl-edge of the unique contribution that these different skills and processes make to reading comprehension development is limited because the majority of work in this field has focused on a single

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Verbal working memory predicts later mathematics and reading comprehension.

    “verbal WM abilities predict later mathematical ability and reading comprehension (Bull, Espy & Wiebe, 2008; Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant, 2004; Wilson & Swanson, 2001).”
  • Differences in working memory ability in children with reading comprehension problems and with learning difficulties remain after account has been taken of variation in verbal IQ.

    “differences in working memory ability in both children with reading comprehension problems and with learning difficulties remain after account has been taken of variation in verbal IQ (Cain et al., 2004; Siegel & Ryan, 1989)”

    From Working memory in children with reading disabilities (2006) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2004-03
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
31-42
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1989621340
Cited by
1,496
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 102 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 71
FWCI
36.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
reading comprehension, working memory capacity, children, inferential reasoning, comprehension monitoring, verbal ability, vocabulary, digit span, mediation, longitudinal prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review