Cited by 87Neural dynamics and brain functionPersonality Traits and PsychologyEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EXTRAVERSION—INTROVERSION AND THE EEG

GALE, ANTHONY, COLES, MICHAEL, BLAYDON, JENNIFER·1969·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Studies relating measures of the EEG to extraversion—introversion are reviewed and criteria set up for their evaluation. A new measure of mean dominant frequency is proposed. Extravert and introvert EEGs are compared, firstly across the whole frequency range (with eyes closed) and secondly across theta, alpha and beta ranges under alternating conditions of eyes closed/eyes open. With the eyes closed, the extravert EEG is higher in integrated output than the introvert EEG across the whole measured range, the differences in output being greater in the lower alpha range. Such differences in alpha are not so readily apparent with eyes closed when recording with a gross filter which fails to discriminate among within‐alpha frequencies. However, with eyes open, and given monotonous visual stimulation, even a gross filter shows differential output. Prolonged recording also reveals differences in theta and beta these differences are stronger when the eyes are shut.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01194.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gale, Coles, and Blaydon (1969) found differential EEG scores for introverts and extraverts, with extraverts showing EEG scores consistent with a greater level of cortical inhibition dynamism.

    “Research by Gale, Coles, & Blaydon (1969) similarly found differential EEG scores for introverts and extraverts, with extraverts showing EEG scores consistent with a greater level of cortical inhibition dynamism in accordance with the arousal theory.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Gale, Coles, & Blaydon (1969)

  • Support for Eysenck's (1967) arousal theory has been established by several studies investigating group differences in electroencephalograph (EEG) readings.

    “Support for Eysenck's (1967) arousal theory has been established by several studies investigating group differences in electroencephalograph (EEG) readings (Gale, Coles, & Blaydon, 1969; Savage, 1964).”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Gale, Coles, & Blaydon, 1969

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
GALE, A., COLES, M., & BLAYDON, J.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-05
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
209-223
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2163776106
Cited by
86
References
32
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
extraversion-introversion, EEG, alpha rhythm, theta oscillations, beta oscillations, eye state, visual stimulation, personality traits
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Electroencephalography, Extraversion, Psychological, Eye Movements, Eyelids, Humans, Introversion, Psychological, Personality Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review