The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differentiating phonological memory and awareness of rhyme: Reading and vocabulary development in children
Abstract
A study of 4‐and 5‐year‐old children investigated whether measures of phonological memory and rhyme awareness reflect a common phonological processing skill or differentiable phonological abilities. Tests of phonological memory, rhyme oddity detection, reading, vocabulary and non‐verbal intelligence were given to the children in each age group. Factor analyses performed on the measures showed that phonological memory and rhyme awareness measures did indeed share a common phonological processing component, but other analyses established that the two types of phonological processing task were nonetheless differentially linked with reading and vocabulary development. The two phonological memory measures taken in the study–non‐word repetition and digit span–were significantly related to vocabulary knowledge in both the ages 4 and 5 groups, and to reading achievement at age 5, but not age 4. These findings replicate and extend our earlier findings. In contrast, rhyme awareness scores were not significantly associated with vocabulary knowledge at either age, but were strongly related to scores on one of the reading tests, a multiple‐choice measure, at both ages 4 and 5. The pattern of findings indicates that, although there appears to be a common phonological processing component underpinning phonological memory and phonological awareness tasks, the tasks also reflect separate cognitive skills which make differential contributions to reading and vocabulary development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The phonological loop as a language learning device.
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158 · Cited by 2,199
Self-citationA structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002 · Cited by 606
Self-citationShort‐term and working memory in specific language impairment
Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/13682820500442602 · Cited by 553
Self-citationPhonological short-term memory and new word learning in children.
Gathercole, S. E., Hitch, G. J., Service, E., & Martin, A. J. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.966 · Cited by 462
Self-citationPhonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00641-w · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Baddeley, A. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-406
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W1994531523
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiating phonological memory and awareness of rhyme: Reading and vocabulary development in children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02407.x
- The paper
- Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). Differentiating phonological memory and awareness of rhyme: Reading and vocabulary development in children. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02407.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.