The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theory‐of‐mind deficits and causal attributions
Abstract
The ability to understand and conceptualize the mental processes of other people is considered to play a vital role in social interactions. Deficits in this area, sometimes known as theory‐of‐mind (ToM) deficits, have been identified as playing a possible causal role in autism, Asperger's syndrome and schizophrenic disorders, particularly paranoia. Paranoia has also been associated with an abnormal attributional style, an observation that suggests that ToM and attributional processes may be related phenomena. This paper describes a study examining the relationship between attributional processes and ToM deficits. Seventy‐seven undergraduate participants completed a ToM task and forty‐six also completed the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire (IPSAQ). ToM deficits were associated with an increased tendency to identify other individuals as responsible for negative social situations. The implications of the observed relationship between attributions and ToM deficits are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Social Brain: Mind, Language, and Society in Evolutionary Perspective
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158 · Cited by 1,068
Self-citationPerspective Taking and Memory Capacity Predict Social Network Size
Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.04.001 · Cited by 429
Self-citationKanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F.-M., & Singer, T. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082 · Cited by 421
Rutherford, M. D., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2002) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1015497629971 · Cited by 411
Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size
Lewis, P. A., Rezaie, R., Brown, R., Roberts, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.030 · Cited by 321
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinderman, P., Dunbar, R., & Bentall, R. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-204
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2052392187
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory‐of‐mind deficits and causal attributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02680.x
- The paper
- Kinderman, P., Dunbar, R., & Bentall, R. P. (1998). Theory‐of‐mind deficits and causal attributions. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02680.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.