Cited by 321Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size

Open access
Lewis, Penelope A., Rezaie, Roozbeh, Brown, Rachel, Roberts, Neil, Dunbar, R.I.M.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Cognitive abilities such as Theory of Mind (ToM), and more generally mentalizing competences, are central to human sociality. Neuroimaging has associated these abilities with specific brain regions including temporo-parietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, frontal pole, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Previous studies have shown both that mentalizing competence, indexed as the ability to correctly understand others' belief states, is associated with social network size and that social group size is correlated with frontal lobe volume across primate species (the social brain hypothesis). Given this, we predicted that both mentalizing competences and the number of social relationships a person can maintain simultaneously will be a function of gray matter volume in these regions associated with conventional Theory of Mind. We used voxel-based morphometry of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) to test this hypothesis in humans. Specifically, we regressed individuals' mentalizing competences and social network sizes against gray matter volume. This revealed that gray matter volume in bilateral posterior frontal pole and left temporoparietal junction and superior temporal sucus varies parametrically with mentalizing competence. Furthermore, gray matter volume in the medial orbitofrontal cortex and the ventral portion of medial frontal gyrus, varied parametrically with both mentalizing competence and social network size, demonstrating a shared neural basis for these very different facets of sociality. These findings provide the first fine-grained anatomical support for the social brain hypothesis. As such, they have important implications for our understanding of the constraints limiting social cognition and social network size in humans, as well as for our understanding of how such abilities evolved across primates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.030

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cross-sectional studies, social isolation or perceived isolation is associated with brain structure abnormalities, including lower total brain volumes, gray matter volumes, and greater white matter lesion volumes.

    “In cross-sectional studies, social isolation or perceived isolation is associated with brain structure abnormalities (volumes and thickness), including lower total brain volumes, gray matter volumes, and greater white matter lesion volumes (Lewis et al., 2011; Salinas et al., 2022; Shen et al., 2022; van der Velpen et al., 2022; Kanai et al., 2012).”

    From Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) Among Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old With Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment: Topline Results (2024) · cites this paper as Lewis et al., 2011

    The Results (page not supplied) report that people with larger social networks had greater gray matter volume in specific ventromedial prefrontal regions, supporting a narrower association between social ties and brain structure. The paper does not establish the cited sentence’s claims about perceived isolation, lower total brain volume, cortical thickness, or greater white matter lesion volume. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Astington JW The Child’s Discovery of the Mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge (MA) 1993
  2. Burgess PW Quayle A Frith CD Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography Neuropsychologia 2001 39 545 555 11257280
  3. Castelli I Baglio F Blasi V Alberoni M Falini A Liverta-Sempio O Nemni R Marchetti A Effects of aging on mindreading ability through the eyes: an fMRI study Neuropsychologia 2010 48 2586 2594 20457166
  4. Coltheart M From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure Tim Shallice Cambridge University Press New York 1989 xvi 462 1988 illus. $59.50; paper, $24.95. Science 246, 827-828 17748711
  5. Decety J Lamm C The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition Neuroscientist 2007 13 580 593 17911216
  6. den Ouden HE Frith U Frith C Blakemore SJ Thinking about intentions Neuroimage 2005 28 787 796 15964210
  7. Dunbar RIM Why are apes so smart Kappeler P Pereira M Primate Life Histories and Socioecology Chicago University Press Chicago 2003 285 298
  8. Dunbar RIM Darwin and the ghost of Phineas Gage: neuro-evolution and the social brain Cortex 2009 45 1119 1125 19559409
  9. Dunbar RIM Evolutionary basis of the social brain Decety J Cacioppo J Oxford Handbook of Social Neuroscience Oxford University Press Oxford 2011
  10. Dunbar RIM Shultz S Understanding primate brain evolution Phil Trans R Soc Lond 2007 362B 649 658 PMC2346523 17301028
  11. Dunbar RIM Spoors M Social networks, support cliques and kinship Human Nature 1995 6 273 290 24203093
  12. Frith U Frith CD Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2003 358 459 473 12689373 PMC1693139
  13. Gallagher HL Happe F Brunswick N Fletcher PC Frith U Frith CD Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks Neuropsychologia 2000 38 11 21 10617288
  14. German TP Niehaus JL Roarty MP Giesbrecht B Miller MB Neural correlates of detecting pretense: automatic engagement of the intentional stance under covert conditions J Cogn Neurosci 2004 16 1805 1817 15701230
  15. Girgis RR Minshew NJ Melhem NM Nutche JJ Keshavan MS Hardan AY Volumetric alterations of the orbitofrontal cortex in autism Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007 31 41 45 16863674 PMC2888006
  16. Good CD Scahill RI Fox NC Ashburner J Friston KJ Chan D Crum WR Rossor MN Frackowiak RS Automatic differentiation of anatomical patterns in the human brain: validation with studies of degenerative dementias Neuroimage 2002 17 29 46 12482066
  17. Hardan AY Muddasani S Vemulapalli M Keshavan MS Minshew NJ An MRI study of increased cortical thickness in autism Am J Psychiatry 2006 163 1290 1292 16816240 PMC1509104
  18. Healy SD Rowe C A critique of comparative studies of brain size Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 2007 274B 453 464 PMC1766390 17476764
  19. Henson RN Rugg MD Shallice T Dolan RJ Confidence in recognition memory for words: dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval J Cogn Neurosci 2000 12 913 923 11177413
  20. Herold R Feldmann A Simon M Tenyi T Kover F Nagy F Varga E Fekete S Regional gray matter reduction and theory of mind deficit in the early phase of schizophrenia: a voxel-based morphometric study Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009 119 199 208 19016669
  21. Hill RA Dunbar RIM Social network size in humans Human Nature 2003 14 640 53 72 26189988
  22. Ke X Hong S Tang T Zou B Li H Hang Y Zhou Z Ruan Z Lu Z Tao G Liu Y Voxel-based morphometry study on brain structure in children with high-functioning autism Neuroreport 2008 19 921 925 18520994
  23. Lazar NA Luna B Sweeney JA Eddy WF Combining brains: a survey of methods for statistical pooling of information Neuroimage 2002 16 538 550 12030836
  24. Leslie AM Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToM Cognition 1994 50 211 238 8039362
  25. Lieberman MD Cunningham WA Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: rebalancing the scale Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2009 4 423 428 20035017 PMC2799956
  26. Moll J de Oliveira-Souza R Bramati IE Grafman J Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments Neuroimage 2002 16 696 703 12169253
  27. Patterson K Nestor PJ Rogers TT Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain Nat Rev Neurosci 2007 8 976 987 18026167
  28. Perner J Aichhorn M Kronbichler M Staffen W Ladurner G Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction Soc Neurosci 2006 1 245 258 18633791
  29. Powell JL Lewis PA Dunbar RI Garcia-Finana M Roberts N Orbital prefrontal cortex volume correlates with social cognitive competence Neuropsychologia 2010 48 3554 3562 20713074
  30. Rempel-Clower NL Role of orbitofrontal cortex connections in emotion Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007 1121 72 86 17846152
  31. Rolls ET Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion Acta Physiol Hung 2008 95 131 164 18642756
  32. Rudebeck PH Bannerman DM Rushworth MF The contribution of distinct subregions of the ventromedial frontal cortex to emotion, social behavior, and decision making Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2008 8 485 497 19033243
  33. Saxe R Why and how to study Theory of Mind with fMRI Brain Res 2006 1079 57 65 16480695
  34. Saxe R Carey S Kanwisher N Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging Ann Rev Psychol 2004 55 87 124 14744211
  35. Saxe R Kanwisher N People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporoparietal junction in “theory of mind” Neuroimage 2003 19 1835 1842 12948738
  36. Saxe R Powell LJ It’s the thought that counts: specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind Psychol Sci 2006 17 692 699 16913952
  37. Shamay-Tsoory SG Aharon-Peretz J Perry D Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions Brain 2009 132 617 627 18971202
  38. Shultz S Dunbar RIM The evolution of the social brain: Anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates Proc R Society Lond B 2007 274B 2429 2436 PMC2274976 17652066
  39. Shultz S Dunbar RIM Encephalisation is not a universal macroevolutionary phenomenon in mammals but is associated with sociality Proc Nat Acad Sci USA in press PMC3003036 21098277
  40. Sommer M Dohnel K Sodian B Meinhardt J Thoermer C Hajak G Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning Neuroimage 2007 35 1378 1384 17376703
  41. Spreng RN Mar RA Kim AS The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative metaanalysis J Cogn Neurosci 2009 21 489 510 18510452
  42. Stuss DT Gallup GG Jr Alexander MP The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’ Brain 2001 124 279 286 11157555
  43. Szily E Keri S Emotion-related brain regions Ideggyogy Sz 2008 61 77 86 18459448
  44. Vollm BA Taylor AN Richardson P Corcoran R Stirling J McKie S Deakin JF Elliott R Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task Neuroimage 2006 29 90 98 16122944
  45. Walter H Adenzato M Ciaramidaro A Enrici I Pia L Bara BG Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex J Cogn Neurosci 2004 16 1854 1863 15701234
  46. Wimmer H Perner J Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception Cognition 1983 13 103 128 6681741
  47. Zhou W-X Sornette D Hill RA Dunbar RIM Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes Proc R Soc Lond 2005 272B 439 444 PMC1634986 15734699

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, P. A., Rezaie, R., Brown, R., Roberts, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • British Academy (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Penelope A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1624-1629
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045065057
Cited by
321
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
FWCI
38.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Liverpool
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Oxford
  • British Academy Centenary Research Project
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
theory of mind, mentalization, social network size, social brain hypothesis, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, gray matter volume, frontal pole, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Social Behavior, Social Support, Prefrontal Cortex, Comprehension, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review