Cited by 988Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial Representations and Identity

The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence

Turner, John C., Oakes, Penelope J.·1986·British Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The distinctive metatheoretical and empirical significance of the social identity concept for social psychology is outlined with special reference to social influence and group polarization. ‘Individualism’ and ‘interactionism’ are summarized and contrasted as alternative metatheories of social psychology and it is argued that the social identity concept embodies the latter. A social identity theory of group behaviour (and the individual‐group relationship) is introduced and from it are derived further theories of social influence and group polarization. The latter is explained as a special case of normal intragroup influence. It is shown how the social identity theory (theories) of group behaviour, social influence and group polarization explicitly assumes a functional interaction between psychological and social processes, in contrast to individualism, and at the same time generates distinctive, testable, empirical predictions. It is concluded that the social identity concept represents a mechanism of social‐psychological interaction and as such demonstrates that social psychology need not be an individualistic science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social identity theory explains the individual's drive to enhance their self-concept through conformity with group norms, which reward individuals with social approval.

    “Social identity theory explains the individual's drive to enhance their self-concept through conformity with group norms (Turner & Oakes, 1986), which reward individuals with social approval (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).”

    From Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter (2023) · cites this paper as Turner & Oakes, 1986

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Turner, John C.
Venue
British Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
237-252
ISSN
  • 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8309
OpenAlex
W2012435098
Cited by
988
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
social identity, social identity theory, individualism, interactionism, social influence, group polarization, group behavior, metatheory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review