The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: Delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes
Abstract
Two analyses of patient delay in seeking a medical diagnosis are considered. In the first, a model of delay is presented. Specifically, delay is comprised of four stages (appraisal, illness, behavioural and scheduling delay intervals), each governed by a conceptually distinct set of decisional and appraisal processes beginning with the initial day that an unexplained symptom is detected to the day the individual appears before a physician. The second analysis is a social psychological one of the attributions individuals draw when relating their symptoms to their expectations and knowledge about physiological bodily processes. The eight principles of Psychophysiological Comparison Theory (PCT) provide the basis for clarifying the psychological processes of symptom interpretation and appraisal. Two studies were conducted with women seeking diagnostic evaluations for prevalent cancers: breast or gynaecological tumours. Regarding the delay model, results indicated that the delay intervals were independent (i.e. uncorrelated). Also, appraisal delay constituted the majority (at least 60 per cent) of the total delay. In the test of PCT, support was found across measures of symptoms, the context in which the symptoms arose, and the inferences people made about the symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Emotional states and physical health.
Salovey, P., Rothman, A. J., Detweiler, J. B., & Steward, W. T. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.110 · Cited by 864
Stage theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues.
Weinstein, N. D., Rothman, A. J., & Sutton, S. R. (1998) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.17.3.290 · Cited by 668
Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults
Robb, K., Stubbings, S., Ramirez, A., Macleod, U., Austoker, J., Waller, J., Hiom, S., & Wardle, J. (2009) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2009.3817.1 · Cited by 329
“I'll look after my health, later”: an investigation of procrastination and health
Sirois, F. M., Melia-Gordon, M. L., & Pychyl, T. A. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00326-4 · Cited by 292
Ingebrigtsen, S. G., Scheel, B. I., Hart, B., Thorsen, T., & Holtedahl, K. (2013) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cms065 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, B. L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Roberts, D. C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-52
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W2017655433
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: Delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01047.x
- The paper
- Andersen, B. L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Roberts, D. C. (1995). Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: Delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes. British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01047.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.