The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults
Open accessAbstract
_Objective:_: To assess public awareness of cancer warning signs, anticipated delay, and perceived barriers to seeking medical advice in the British population. Methods: We carried out a population-based survey using face-to-face, computer-assisted interviews to administer the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM), a newly-developed, validated measure of cancer awareness. The sample included 2216 adults (970 male and 1246 female) recruited as part of the Office for National Statistics Opinions Survey using stratified probability sampling.*Results:* Awareness of cancer warning signs was low when open-ended (recall) questions were used and higher with closed (recognition) questions; but on either measure, awareness was lower in those who were male, younger, and from lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups or ethnic minorities. The most commonly endorsed barriers to help-seeking were difficulty making an appointment, worry about wasting the doctor’s time and worry about what would be found. Emotional barriers were more prominent in lower SES groups and practical barriers (e.g. too busy) more prominent in higher SES groups. Anticipated delay was lower in ethnic minority and lower SES groups. In multivariate analysis, higher symptom awareness was associated with lower anticipated delay, and more barriers with greater anticipated delay. Conclusions: A combination of public education about symptoms and empowerment to seek medical advice, as well as support at primary care level, could enhance early presentation and improve cancer outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779943000116 · Cited by 1,985
Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review
Richards, M., Westcombe, A., Love, S., Littlejohns, P., & Ramirez, A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02143-1 · Cited by 1,171
Self-citationEUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary
Sant, M., Allemani, C., Santaquilani, M., Knijn, A., Marchesi, F., & Capocaccia, R. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.018 · Cited by 1,021
EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990–94—results and commentary
Sant, M., Aareleid, T., Berrino, F., Bielska Lasota, M., Carli, P. M., Faivre, J., Grosclaude, P., Hédelin, G., Matsuda, T., Møller, H., et al. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg754 · Cited by 1,011
Berrino, F., De Angelis, R., Sant, M., Rosso, S., Lasota, M. B., Coebergh, J. W., & Santaquilani, M. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70245-0 · Cited by 807
Factors predicting delayed presentation of symptomatic breast cancer: a systematic review
Ramirez, A., Westcombe, A., Burgess, C., Sutton, S., Littlejohns, P., & Richards, M. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02142-x · Cited by 493
Self-citationDelay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: Delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes
Andersen, B. L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Roberts, D. C. (1995) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01047.x · Cited by 414
Fatalism among elderly African Americans: Effects on colorectal cancer screening
Powe, B. D. (1995) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-199510000-00008 · Cited by 335
Women's knowledge and beliefs regarding breast cancer
Grunfeld, E. A., Ramirez, A. J., Hunter, M. S., & Richards, M. A. (2002) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600260 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence
Zhou, Y., Abel, G. A., Hamilton, W., Pritchard-Jones, K., Gross, C. P., Walter, F. M., Renzi, C., Johnson, S., McPhail, S., Elliss-Brookes, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.155 · Cited by 214
Lewis, L., Marcu, A., Whitaker, K., & Maguire, R. (2018) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12745 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Robb, K., Stubbings, S., Ramirez, A., Macleod, U., Austoker, J., Waller, J., Hiom, S., & Wardle, J.
- Venue
- Nature Precedings
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S18-S23
- ISSN
- 1756-0357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039760601
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 16
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/npre.2009.3817.1
- The paper
- Robb, K., Stubbings, S., Ramirez, A., Macleod, U., Austoker, J., Waller, J., Hiom, S., & Wardle, J. (2009). Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults. Nature Precedings. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3817.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.