The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of applying factor analysis to non‐normal categorical variables. A Monte Carlo study is conducted where five prototypical cases of non‐normal variables are generated. Two normal theory estimators, ML and GLS, are compared to Browne's (1982) ADF estimator. A categorical variable methodology (CVM) estimator of Muthén (1984) is also considered for the most severely skewed case. Results show that ML and GLS chi‐square tests are quite robust but obtain too large values for variables that arc severely skewed and kurtotic. ADF, however, performs well. Parameter estimate bias appears non‐existent for all estimators. Results also show that ML and GLS estimated standard errors are biased downward. For ADF no such standard error bias was found. The CVM estimator appears to work well when applied to severely skewed variables that had been dichotomized. ML and GLS results for a kurtosis only case showed no distortion of chi‐square or parameter estimates and only a slight downward bias in estimated standard errors. The results are compared to those of other related studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The normality of continuous variables was assessed by examining skewness statistics and normal probability plots. Following the suggestion by Muthen and Kaplan [65], skewness and kurtosis values within the range of −1 to +1 were considered acceptable indicators of normality.”
In the citing paper
“In the empirical field, an inverse association has been consistently found between the capacity for full awareness of the present moment (mindfulness) and the presence of psychological distress [20, 24].”
From Psychological inflexibility mediates the relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress in Peruvian parents with school age children. (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Univariate normality of the data was verified using the guidelines proposed by Muthén and Kaplan (1985) before the analysis of the sample’s results (i.e., to check if acceptable values for asymmetry/asymmetry and kurtosis were in the range from − 1 to + 1 in the case of normal univariate data distribution).”
From Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (2022) · cites this paper as Muthén and Kaplan (1985)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,003
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the WHOQOL-BREF Using a Multitrait-Multimethod Approach
Hsiao, Y., Wu, C., & Yao, G. (2013) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0313-z · Cited by 22
“1 (Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
MethodDazzi, C. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.032 · Cited by 22
Factorial Structure of the SCAS and Its Relationship With the SDQ
Riso, D. D., Chessa, D., Bobbio, A., & Lis, A. (2012) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000117 · Cited by 22
“Univariate skewness and kurtosis of all SCAS items were checked in order to evaluate the normality of item distribution (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
Traits grow important with increasing age: customer age, brand personality and loyalty
Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., Landes, M., & Moser, K. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-016-0834-4 · Cited by 27
Marsh, H. W., Dicke, T., & Pfeiffer, M. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.011 · Cited by 25
Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Ordered-Categorical Data
Elosua, P. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 22
Assessing Perceived Ability to Cope With Trauma
Bosmans, M. W. G., Komproe, I. H., Loey, N. E. E. V., van der Knaap, L. M., Benight, C. C., & van der Velden, P. G. (2015) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000266 · Cited by 22
“…t he in di vi du al u se r a nd is n ot to b e di ss em in at ed b ro ad ly . transformation, values of skewness (maximum 1.553) and kurtosis (maximum value 1.494) were well within the values of univariate nonnormality that cause problems in CFA (Curran, West, & Finch, 1996; Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialHoijtink, H., Rooks, G., & Wilmink, F. W. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.300 · Cited by 22
Childbearing Adolescents and Problem Behavior Theory
Gillmore, M. R., Spencer, M. S., Larson, N. C., Duong-Tran, Q., & Gilchrist, L. D. (1998) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1300/j079v24n01_04 · Cited by 22
Fernández, M., Benítez, J. L., Pichardo, M. C., Fernández, E., Justicia, F. J., García, T., Berbén, A. B. G., Justicia, A., & Corredor, G. A. (2017) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.25115/ejrep.v8i22.1415 · Cited by 21
“The value of the results supports use of the maximum probability estimator in later confirmatory analyses (Edwards et al., 2003; Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodZhang, L., & Li, Z. (2020) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01771-w · Cited by 21
“We conducted the analysis based on polychoric correlation with WLSMV estimator, which is more recommended due to the ordinary nature and the non-normal distribution of the data [44].”
MethodRoemer, A., Sutton, A., Grimm, C., & Medvedev, O. (2020) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2997 · Cited by 16
Short Sexual Well-Being Scale – a cross-sectional validation among transgender and cisgender people
Gerymski, R. (2020) · Health Psychology Report · doi:10.5114/hpr.2021.102349 · Cited by 20
Lin, J. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221074027 · Cited by 25
“When the distribution is not normal, treating the categorical data as continuous might lead to underestimation of correlations and a less interesting model (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundXie, J., Wen, Z., Shen, J., Tan, Y., Liu, X., Yang, Y., & Zheng, X. (2023) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12172 · Cited by 21
Factors affecting the utilization of the internet by internationalizing firms in transition markets
Tho, N. D. (2007) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500710754592 · Cited by 21
Alfaro, J., Guzmán, J., García, C., Sirlopú, D., Reyes, F., & Varela, J. J. (2015) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-015-9342-2 · Cited by 26
“Univariate descriptive inform 3 items with higher kurtosis values (range 17.75 and 37.23), therefore a Polychoric Correlations Matrix was considered, follow some researchers recommend to deal with non-normal data (Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Item-Level Examination of the Factorial Validity of NEO Five-Factor Inventory Scores
Hull, D. M., Beaujean, A. A., Worrell, F. C., & Verdisco, A. E. (2010) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164410378091 · Cited by 21
“…recommended by other methodologists (e.g., Bernstein & Teng, 1989; Panter, Swygert, Dahlstrom, & Tanaka, 1997): (a) item-level exploratory factor analysis (B. O. Muthén, 1979; B. O. Muthén & Kaplan, 1992) with orthogonal and oblique rotations and (b) item-level CFA (Flora & Curran, 2004).”
A graded response model for measuring person reliability
Ferrando, P. J. (2009) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711008x377745 · Cited by 21
Computing Robust, Bootstrap-Adjusted Fit Indices for Use With Nonnormal Data
Walker, D. A., & Smith, T. J. (2016) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175616671365 · Cited by 21
Aniwattanapong, D., Tangwongchai, S., Supasitthumrong, T., Hemrunroj, S., Tunvirachaisakul, C., Tawankanjanachot, I., Chuchuen, P., Snabboon, T., Carvalho, A. F., & Maes, M. H. J. (2018) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2018.1501668 · Cited by 21
“We used a polychoric correlation matrix when the univariate distribution of ordinal items was asymmetric with excess of curtosis (Muth en & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodCommon Mistakes in Statistical and Methodological Practices of Sport Management Research
Kim, Y., & Lee, J. L. (2018) · Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science · doi:10.1080/1091367x.2018.1537278 · Cited by 24
“In addition, it has been found that parameter estimates and standard errors based on ML are negatively biased when the observed categorical data are used to estimate model (Babakus et al.1987; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodValidation of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) questionnaire in Australian public hospitals
Taylor, N. J., Clay‐Williams, R., Ting, H. P., Winata, T., Arnolda, G., Hogden, E., Lawton, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2019) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzz097 · Cited by 22
The role of supervisor knowledge sharing behavior in stimulating subordinate creativity
Thuan, L. C. (2020) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-08-2019-0124 · Cited by 21
Zagalaz, J. C., Manrique, I. L., Veledo, M. B. S. P., Sánchez, M. L. Z., & de Mesa, C. G. G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12031002 · Cited by 21
“A descriptive analysis of the items that make up the scale was performed, finding that the distribution of Items 5 and 25 present skewness and kurtosis values that exceed ±2, the value recommended by Bandalos and Finney [44], Muthén and Kaplan [45], and Muthén and Kaplan [46].”
MethodA re-evaluation of the Type D personality effect
Lodder, P. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110254 · Cited by 21
Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study
Şimşek, G. G., & Noyan, F. (2011) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9467-4 · Cited by 21
Tezcan, B., Ademoğlu, D., Can, M., Kazancı, D., Mungan, İ., Taştemur, S., Ceylan, C., & Turan, S. (2021) · Journal of Endourology · doi:10.1089/end.2020.0101 · Cited by 22
Double Jeopardy-Analyzing the Combined Effect of Age and Gender Stereotype Threat on Older Workers
Manzi, C., Sorgente, A., Reverberi, E., Tagliabue, S., & Gorli, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.606690 · Cited by 22
Tashiro, J., Parga, D., Pollard, J. A., & Talanquer, V. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d0rp00255k · Cited by 21
Vinkóczi, T., Rácz, É. H., & Koltai, J. P. (2024) · Cleaner Waste Systems · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100146 · Cited by 20
Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Ajuste Escolar Percibido por el Profesor (PROF-A)
Cava, M. J., Povedano, A., Buelga, S., & Ochoa, G. M. (2015) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.1016/j.psi.2015.04.001 · Cited by 22
Market Values of Environmental Amenities: A Latent Variable Approach
Arguea, N. M., & Hsiao, C. (2000) · Journal of Housing Economics · doi:10.1006/jhec.2000.0261 · Cited by 20
Walton, D. M., Putos, J., Beattie, T., & MacDermid, J. C. (2016) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.002 · Cited by 20
Krägeloh, C. U., Billington, D. R., Hsu, P. H., Feng, X. J., Medvedev, O. N., Kersten, P., Landon, J., & Siegert, R. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166065 · Cited by 20
The reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire
Solé, E., Castarlenas, E., Sánchez‐Rodríguez, E., Galán, S., de la Vega, R., Jensen, M. P., & Miró, J. (2017) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105316686669 · Cited by 21
Sex differences in the development of achievement goals in middle school
Theis, D., & Fischer, N. (2017) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.006 · Cited by 25
Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: Analysis of Factorial Invariance Across Gender
Jiang, X., & Huebner, E. S. (2017) · Journal of Well-Being Assessment · doi:10.1007/s41543-017-0002-9 · Cited by 20
“Item level screening revealed that the kurtosis of the seven items was between −2 and +2 in the female group, but not in the male group (kurtosis of Item 5 = 2.99), suggesting the distribution of Item 5 in males was deviant from normality (Boomsma and Hoogland 2001; Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialGamst-Klaussen, T., Gudex, C. M., & Olsen, J. A. (2018) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0975-y · Cited by 20
Digiuseppe, R. A., Gorman, B. S., & Raptis, J. (2020) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-020-00349-0 · Cited by 20
Zimprich, D., Kliegel, M., & Rast, P. (2011) · European Journal of Ageing · doi:10.1007/s10433-011-0174-8 · Cited by 20
“…items as if they were continuous, previous research has demonstrated that this typically leads to parameters and standard errors being negatively biased, especially if the number of categories is small and the distribution shows departures from normality (DiStefano 2002; Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Rejoinder on Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models
Kaplan, D. M. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_8 · Cited by 20
Self-citationKjørmo, O., & Halvari, H. (2002) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2002.94.3.950 · Cited by 20
Liao, Y., & Ma, L. (2019) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577907 · Cited by 20
“Moreover, it can lead to underestimation of the standard errors of parameter estimates, and consequently, the biases when testing for the statistical significance of specific relationships (Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
BackgroundPsychometric properties of the Kurdish version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Seidi, P. A.-M., Mohammadi, H., Khazaie, H., Abas, N. Q., & Jaff, D. (2019) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2019.04.022 · Cited by 21
Sweet, L., Savoie, J. A., & Lemyre, L. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0087093 · Cited by 20
Aboagye, M. O., Qin, J., Pekárková, S., Antwi, C. O., Jababu, Y., Asare, K., Affum‐Osei, E., & Akinyi, N. (2019) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-019-00488-0 · Cited by 19
“Skewness and kurtosis met their recommended threshold (B ±2.0), indicating normal distribution, a critical assumption underlying the maximum likelihood procedure (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985; Curran, West, & Finch, 1996; Finney & DiStefano, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialÁvila, C. W., Maria, M. D., Vellone, E., Riegel, B. J., Bernardes, D. D. S., Silveira, L. C. J., & Rabelo, E. R. (2020) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000704 · Cited by 18
Parsons, J. T., Huszti, H. C., Crudder, S. O., Gage, B., Jarvis, D., Mendoza, J. L., & Parish, K. L. (1998) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1022325805088 · Cited by 19
Neighborhood Environment, Self-efficacy, and Physical Activity in Urban Adolescents
Voorhees, C. C. (2011) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.35.6.4 · Cited by 19
An importance–performance analysis of media activities associated with WNBA game consumption
Zhang, J. J., Lam, E. T. C., Cianfrone, B. A., Zapalac, R. K., Holland, S., & Williamson, D. P. (2010) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 20
Renzaho, A. M. N., & Karantzas, G. C. (2010) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00574.x · Cited by 22
Caruso, R., Grassi, L. G., Biancosino, B., Marmai, L., Bonatti, L., Moscara, M., Rigatelli, M., Carr, C. E., & Priebe, S. (2013) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-13-242 · Cited by 19
“Item responses used the full range of scores (0–4) for each item, but many were highly skewed indicating that polychoric correlation coefficients were required [30,37-39].”
BackgroundPolek, E., Jones, P. B., Fearon, P. R. M., Brodbeck, J., Moutoussis, M., Dolan, R. J., Fonagy, P., Bullmore, E. T., & Goodyer, I. M. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1595-0 · Cited by 21
“We subsequently computed a series of EFAs with WLSMV estimator extracting 1 to 10 factors [40, 41], treating items as categorical variables.”
MethodRohde, J. A., Verdín, D., Doyle, J., Godwin, A., Kirn, A. N., Benson, L., & Potvin, G. (2018) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659311 · Cited by 19
“0 [32], [33].”
Aytürk, E., Cham, H., Jennings, P. A., & Brown, J. L. (2019) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164419865017 · Cited by 21
“…estimates ( 10% bias) but negatively biased standard error estimates when the indicators have five or more categories and are moderately nonnormal (2.90 skewness 1.38, 21.19 kurtosis 21.92; Babakus, Ferguson, & Jöreskog, 1987; B. Muthén & Kaplan, 1985; Rhemtulla, Brosseau-Liard, & Savalei, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialSandoval-Henríquez, F. J., & Quintana, M. G. B. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104157 · Cited by 19
Gómez, E., & Malega, R. (2007) · Leisure/Loisir · doi:10.1080/14927713.2007.9651374 · Cited by 19
The impact of cultural sensitivity and information exchange on relationship quality
Nguyen, T., & Tho, N. D. (2014) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-12-2012-0140 · Cited by 19
Bekk, M., & Spörrle, M. (2010) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874350101003010054 · Cited by 19
“Muthén and Kaplan [60] parametric analyses seem justified.”
BackgroundTest Standards and Psychometric Modeling
Ziegler, M. D., & Brunner, M. (2016) · Plenum series on human exceptionality · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_2 · Cited by 23
CUR, F. (2002) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.95.5.233-244 · Cited by 19
Rae, G. (2006) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711005x72485 · Cited by 19
Latent Growth Models with Floors, Ceilings, and Random Knots
Feng, Y., Hancock, G. R., & Harring, J. R. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1580556 · Cited by 18
“To demonstrate how the proposed reparameterized models can be fitted within the SEM framework, two illustrative examples are provided using the popular SEM software Mplus (Muth en & Muth en, 1998–2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialParental Participation in the Environment: Scale Validation Across Parental Role, Income, and Region
Jia, F., Sorgente, A., & Yu, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.788306 · Cited by 28
“Descriptive statistics and EFA (performed using Maximum Likelihood as the extraction method, Kaiser as the criterion for factor selection, and Oblimin as rotation method) were performed with SPSS software to evaluate several characteristics of each item: (1) response rate (items with missing data above 30% were discar…”
MethodMeasuring Presenteeism From Work Stress
Mathieu, C., & Gilbreath, B. (2022) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000002753 · Cited by 18
Ruggieri, S. A., Gagliano, M., Bonfanti, R. C., Cucinella, N., & Ingoglia, S. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103889 · Cited by 18
Exploring Pre-Service STEM Teachers’ Capacity to Teach Using a Gender-Responsive Approach
Miralles-Cardona, C., Kitta, I., & Moltó, M. C. C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151411127 · Cited by 24
Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2014) · TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM · doi:10.15390/eb.2014.3619 · Cited by 18
“Item points showed normal distribution since especially the skewness and kurtosis coefficients’ range between -1.0 and 1.0 (Kline, 2011:63; Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialCareer Counselors’ Perceptions of Construction as an Occupational Choice
Francis, V., & Prosser, A. (2012) · Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice · doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000125 · Cited by 18
“There were no extreme variations from normality in the skewness or kurtosis of the variables; consequently, no data transformations were deemed necessary (Muthén and Kaplan 1985).”
BackgroundBorgonovi, F., & Pokropek, A. (2017) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.006 · Cited by 18
Barriers to Research among Faculty at a Health Sciences University
Hagan, J. L., Armbruster, P. C., & Ballard, R. W. (2019) · American Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12691/education-7-1-7 · Cited by 18
“Skewness and kurtosis of responses to individual items were assessed using criteria specified by Muthén & Kaplan [5].”
BackgroundMethodDevelopment of a new undergraduate palliative care knowledge measure
Davis, A., Lippe, M., Burduli, E., & Barbosa‐Leiker, C. (2019) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.06.007 · Cited by 18
Assessing the factorial structure of the mental illness public stigma in Spain
Saavedra, J., Sánchez, S. Á., Corrigan, P. W., & López, M. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1710769 · Cited by 18
“There is abundant literature based on simulation studies that show that the ML method is robust to a moderate non-compliance with multivariate normality when the variables have a normal univariate distribution [25,26].”
BackgroundMusitu-Ferrer, D., Ibáñez, M. E., León-Moreno, C., Callejas-Jerónimo, J. E., & Muñoz, L. V. A. (2020) · Revista de Humanidades · doi:10.5944/rdh.39.2020.25471 · Cited by 18
Latent-Variable Approaches to the Jamesian Model of Importance-Weighted Averages
Scalas, L. F., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212465321 · Cited by 18
“…1998-2008), using the robust maximum likelihood estimator (MLR), which has been found to be efficient in the estimation of latentvariable models based on items rated on answer scales incorporating five or more response categories (Beauducel & Herzberg, 2006; DiStefano, 2002; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodSchreiber, M., Malesios, C., & Psarakis, S. (2011) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/095820211x13176484436131 · Cited by 18
“But according to Muthen & Kaplan (1985) , some degree of skew and kurtosis in the data is acceptable for conducting EFA, especially when the skew and kurtosis coefficients are below the value of 2.”
BackgroundInfluentialDevelopment of an Attitude Scale to Assess K-12 Teachers' Attitudes toward Nanotechnology
Lan, Y. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.651657 · Cited by 18
“For variables with skewness and kurtosis not far from the range of 21 and +1, estimating the parameter of non-normal variables via the maximum likelihood (ML) method would get acceptable values (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodAn evaluation of the factor structure of the Problem Gambling Severity Index
Boldero, J., & Bell, R. (2011) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2011.635675 · Cited by 18
“…ordered category data and which does not, therefore, assume that the intervals between the categories are equal is, thus, the most appropriate coefficient for use with these data (Holgado-Tello, Chacón-Moscoso, Barbero-Garcı́a, & Vila-Abad, 2010; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985; Wang & Cunningham, 2005).”
MethodTho, N. D., & Nguyen, T. (2011) · Journal of Relationship Marketing · doi:10.1080/15332667.2011.549018 · Cited by 18
Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M. (2004) · Mathematical modelling: theory and applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1958-6_8 · Cited by 18
The Success Factors of Food Events: The Case Study of Umbrian Extra Virgin Olive Oil
Marchini, A., Riganelli, C., & Diotallevi, F. (2015) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2014.1000432 · Cited by 18
“We can consider the degree of non-normality thought the skewness and kurtosis values (Harlow, 1985; Lei & Lomax, 2005; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundGhislieri, C., Martini, M., Gatti, P., & Colombo, L. (2011) · BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) · Cited by 18
Using signals to evaluate the teaching quality of MBA faculty members
Tho, N. D. (2017) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-03-2016-0060 · Cited by 18
Scaini, S., Ogliari, A. L., Carolis, L. D., Bellodi, L., Serio, C. D., & Brombin, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00242 · Cited by 18
“Treating nominal and ordinal data as interval or ratio data, may lead to unreliable parameter estimates as well as to poor goodness of fit, especially in presence of highly skewed non Gaussian data or polarized/bimodal distributions (Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundMethodPropiedades psicométricas de la escala Utrecht Work Engagement Scale en estudiantes de educación
Zagalaz, J. C., Lara-Sánchez, A. J., Sánchez, M. L. Z., Manrique, I. L., & de Mesa, C. G. G. (2018) · Suma Psicológica · doi:10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n2.3 · Cited by 18
Students’ Proactive Aggressiveness, Mental Health Problems and Perceived Classroom Interaction
Ertesvåg, S. K., & Havik, T. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2019.1650822 · Cited by 18
Pathways to Antisocial Behavior Among Adolescent Girls
Talbott, E., & Thiede, K. W. (1999) · Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/106342669900700104 · Cited by 18
Validating the DigComp framework among university students across different educational systems
Abubakari, M. S., Zakaria, G. A. N., & Musa, J. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00652-x · Cited by 17
“Some authors [51] also argue that kurtosis values within the range of ± 2 are sufficient to assume normality for structural equation modelling.”
Arunachalam, T., & Supriya, M. V. (2012) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37302 · Cited by 17
“Muthen and Kaplan (1985) have suggested that if the variables have skewness and kurtosis from +1 to -1, then estimating parameters with maximum likelihood is acceptable.”
BackgroundTesting the triple-match principle among technology employees
de Ven, B. V., & Vlerick, P. (2012) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.682359 · Cited by 17
“Skewness and kurtosis were within the acceptable range (+1.00; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialCoco, A. L., Ingoglia, S., & Lundqvist, L. (2013) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-013-0166-9 · Cited by 17
Nguyen, T., Barrett, N. J., & Tho, N. D. (2006) · Advances in international marketing · doi:10.1016/s1474-7979(06)17004-0 · Cited by 17
Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, P., Baños-Chaparro, J., Ramos‐Vera, C., & Universidad César Vallejo, P. (2020) · Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicología · doi:10.24016/2020.v6n1.225 · Cited by 17
Genetic tobit factor analysis: Quantitative genetic modeling with censored data
Waller, N. G., & Muth�n, B. O. (1992) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01066662 · Cited by 17
“A number of researchers have recently argued, sometimes vociferously (Bradley, 1980), that the assumption of normality is often untenable with biometric and/or social science data (Andrews et al., 1972; Ansell, 1973; Boomsma, 1983; Browne, 1982, 1984, 1987; Harlow, 1985; Hill and Dixon, 1982; Muth6n, 1984, 1987b; Muth…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Role of Person-Organization Fit in Organizational Selection DecisionsPreprint
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1995) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 17
Wah, J. (2025) · J. Cases Inf. Technol. · doi:10.4018/jcit.369092 · Cited by 14
Reliability for Tests With Items Having Different Numbers of Ordered Categories
Kim, S., Lu, Z. L., & Cohen, A. S. (2019) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621619835498 · Cited by 16
“For the five-response category tests, the thresholds used to generate the normal and moderate skew distributions were taken from Muthén and Kaplan (1985).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Muthén, Bengt
- ORCID
- Muthén, Bengt
- Venue
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-189
- ISSN
- 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8317
- OpenAlex
- W1985442257
- Cited by
- 1,778
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- factor analysis, Likert scale data, kurtosis, maximum likelihood estimation, generalized least squares, standard error bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review