The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of applying factor analysis to non‐normal categorical variables. A Monte Carlo study is conducted where five prototypical cases of non‐normal variables are generated. Two normal theory estimators, ML and GLS, are compared to Browne's (1982) ADF estimator. A categorical variable methodology (CVM) estimator of Muthén (1984) is also considered for the most severely skewed case. Results show that ML and GLS chi‐square tests are quite robust but obtain too large values for variables that arc severely skewed and kurtotic. ADF, however, performs well. Parameter estimate bias appears non‐existent for all estimators. Results also show that ML and GLS estimated standard errors are biased downward. For ADF no such standard error bias was found. The CVM estimator appears to work well when applied to severely skewed variables that had been dichotomized. ML and GLS results for a kurtosis only case showed no distortion of chi‐square or parameter estimates and only a slight downward bias in estimated standard errors. The results are compared to those of other related studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The normality of continuous variables was assessed by examining skewness statistics and normal probability plots. Following the suggestion by Muthen and Kaplan [65], skewness and kurtosis values within the range of −1 to +1 were considered acceptable indicators of normality.”
In the citing paper
“In the empirical field, an inverse association has been consistently found between the capacity for full awareness of the present moment (mindfulness) and the presence of psychological distress [20, 24].”
From Psychological inflexibility mediates the relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress in Peruvian parents with school age children. (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Univariate normality of the data was verified using the guidelines proposed by Muthén and Kaplan (1985) before the analysis of the sample’s results (i.e., to check if acceptable values for asymmetry/asymmetry and kurtosis were in the range from − 1 to + 1 in the case of normal univariate data distribution).”
From Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (2022) · cites this paper as Muthén and Kaplan (1985)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Gaspard, H., Wigfield, A., Jiang, Y., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Marsh, H. W. (2017) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.003 · Cited by 136
Marsh, H. W. (1989) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312026002191 · Cited by 137
“Muthen and Kaplan (1985) described alternative approaches to the analysis of such data.”
BackgroundCurran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2002) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3701_01 · Cited by 137
Castellví, P., Forero, C. G., Codony, M., Vilagut, G., Brugulat, P., Medina, A., Gabilondo, A., Mompart, A., Colom, J., Tresserras, R., et al. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0513-7 · Cited by 152
“This method is most advisable when ordinal items are skewed [30, 31].”
MethodAnti-transgender prejudice: A structural equation model of associated constructs.
Tebbe, E. N., & Moradi, B. (2012) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026990 · Cited by 134
DiStefano, C., Shi, D., & Morgan, G. B. (2020) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2020.1803073 · Cited by 135
“Using cutoffs from prior research (e.g., Hoogland & Boomsma, 1998; B. Muthén & Kaplan, 1985), RD with absolute values less than 10% were considered acceptable.”
BackgroundMethodThe Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale: Measurement Invariance between Canada and France
Brien, M., Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Boudrias, J., Desrumaux, P., Brunet, L., & Morin, E. M. (2012) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01067.x · Cited by 136
Aluja, A., Garcı́a, Ó., & Garcı́a, L. F. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00203-4 · Cited by 132
“A Skewness value higher or lower than 1 indicates a distribution that departs significantly from normality (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundMarsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002 · Cited by 132
Harsh parenting, parasympathetic activity, and development of delinquency and substance use.
Hinnant, J. B., Erath, S. A., & El‐Sheikh, M. (2015) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000026 · Cited by 145
Supply chain management practices and firms’ operational performance
Quang, H. T., Sameiro, M., Fernandes, A. C., Sampaio, P. A. D. C. A., Binh, A. D. T., Duong, H. H., & Vilhena, E. (2017) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-05-2015-0072 · Cited by 130
“Thereby, the method of maximum likelihood is appropriate to estimate the parameters in the research models (Muthen and Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodGignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R., Manocha, R., & Stough, C. K. K. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.014 · Cited by 130
Condom use in unmarried Latino men: A test of cultural constructs.
Marín, B. V., Gomez, C. A., Tschann, J. M., & Gregorich, S. E. (1997) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.5.458 · Cited by 129
Development of a Brief Form of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (B–IRI)
Ingoglia, S., Coco, A. L., & Albiero, P. (2016) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1149858 · Cited by 145
“0 (Muth en & Kaplan, 1985).”
Rózsa, S., Rihmer, Z., Gonda, X., Szili, I., Rihmer, A., Kő, N., Németh, A., Pestality, P., Bagdy, G., Alhassoon, O. M., et al. (2007) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.016 · Cited by 125
Sorgente, A., & Lanz, M. (2019) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025419851859 · Cited by 135
Perceived Overqualification and Collectivism Orientation: Implications for Work and Nonwork Outcomes
Luksyte, A., Bauer, T. N., Debus, M. E., Erdoğan, B., & Wu, C. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320948602 · Cited by 123
“We treated items for these constructs as ordinal, categorical data because we measured them using a Likert-type scale and they may not be normally distributed (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodAsymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., Coffman, D. L., & Hartmann, W. M. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.157 · Cited by 123
“The procedure used to generate the data was similar to that of Muthén and Kaplan (1985, 1992).”
Li, F., Bai, X., & Wang, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061137 · Cited by 135
Support for the continuity hypothesis of bulimic pathology.
Stice, E. M., Killen, J. D., Hayward, C., & Taylor, C. B. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 122
Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293 · Cited by 122
“…the already quite complex simulations as simple as possible. studies showing that when the number of categories is at least four, parameters estimated using maximum likelihood are accurate (Beauducel & Herzberg, 2006; DiStefano, 2002; Dolan, 1994; Johnson & Creech, 1983; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodA genetic study of maternal and paternal ratings of problem behaviors in 3-year-old twins.
van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Verhulst, F. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (1996) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.105.3.349 · Cited by 120
“Chi-square tests often erroneously suggest that the model does not fit when scale scores depart too much from normality (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
Structure of problem behaviors in preadolescence.
Gillmore, M. R., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Day, L. E., Moore, M., & Abbott, R. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.59.4.499 · Cited by 120
Performance of Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial Factor Retention Method With Categorical Variables
Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2011) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164410389489 · Cited by 121
“Thresholds for the skewed conditions were created so that the observations were ‘‘piled up’’ in one of the extreme categories (see Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundA contribution to the Italian validation of the General Decision-making Style Inventory
Gambetti, E., Fabbri, M., Bensi, L., & Tonetti, L. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.017 · Cited by 130
Suh, Y. (2015) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937669 · Cited by 137
“Ordered categorical variables usually violate the normality assumption, which could lead to significant problems when the continuous normal theory ML estimation is applied to these variables (e.g., Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodWang, L., Fan, X., & Willson, V. L. (1996) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519609540042 · Cited by 117
Athletes' Evaluations of Their Head Coach's Coaching Competency
Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Maier, K. S., Wolfe, E. W., & Reckase, M. D. (2006) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2006.10599337 · Cited by 136
Meneghel, I., Боргогни, Л., Miraglia, M., Salanova, M., & Martínez, I. M. (2016) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726716631808 · Cited by 137
“We initially checked our data for normality (Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodHohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.011 · Cited by 122
Bartels, M., van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Hudziak, J. J., Rietveld, M. J. H., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.852 · Cited by 117
Achievement Goals, Self-Handicapping, and Performance Attainment: A Mediational Analysis
Elliot, A. J., Cury, F., Fryer, J. W., & Huguet, P. (2006) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.28.3.344 · Cited by 115
The interactive effects of temperament and maternal parenting on toddlers' externalizing behaviours
van Aken, C., Junger, M., Verhoeven, M., van Aken, M. A. G., & Deković, M. (2007) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.529 · Cited by 114
Golob, T. F., & Hensher, D. A. (1998) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/s1361-9209(97)00006-0 · Cited by 113
Factorial validity of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48
Perry, J. L., Clough, P., Crust, L., Earle, K., & Nicholls, A. R. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.020 · Cited by 122
Peer drug associations and emotional restraint: Causes or consequences of adolescents' drug use?
Farrell, A. D., & Danish, S. J. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.2.327 · Cited by 112
Greening the competitive advantage: antecedents and consequences of green brand equity
Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., Hedjasie, R., & Kerschreiter, R. (2015) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0232-y · Cited by 112
Why Is Benevolent Sexism Appealing?
Connelly, K. E., & Heesacker, M. (2012) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684312456369 · Cited by 136
Doane, L. D., Breitenstein, R. S., Beekman, C. R., Clifford, S., Smith, T. J., & Lemery‐Chalfant, K. (2018) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0917-3 · Cited by 110
Bőthe, B., Tóth‐Király, I., Griffiths, M. D., Potenza, M. N., Orosz, G., & Demetrovics, Z. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106603 · Cited by 127
Gucciardi, D. F., Hanton, S., & Mallett, C. J. (2012) · Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027190 · Cited by 112
Tian, L., Du, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2014) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0712-9 · Cited by 129
Kaplan, D. M., & Elliott, P. R. (1997) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519709540056 · Cited by 108
Self-citationCarolan, B. V., & Wasserman, S. J. (2014) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121414562967 · Cited by 111
Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2016) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21631 · Cited by 114
Validity and Reliability Evidence of the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment Tool
Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20124 · Cited by 107
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.008 · Cited by 117
Brewster, M. E., Velez, B. L., DeBlaere, C., & Moradi, B. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025206 · Cited by 108
Tebbe, E. A., Moradi, B., & Ege, E. (2014) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000043 · Cited by 109
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo‐Seva, U. (2000) · Psicologica · Cited by 105
Vassend, O. M., & Skrondal, A. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00182-x · Cited by 110
Hartman, C. A., Hox, J. J., Auerbach, J. G., Erol, N., Fonseca, A. C., Mellenbergh, G. J., Nøvik, T. S., Oosterlaan, J., Roussos, A., Shalev, R. S., et al. (1999) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00527 · Cited by 105
Otis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02215.x · Cited by 122
Costa, S., Ingoglia, S., Inguglia, C., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., & Larcan, R. (2018) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2017.1347021 · Cited by 101
“Data were normally distributed with skewness and kurtosis values ranging approximately from −1.0 to +1.0 (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985), with higher values reported on Item 15.”
MethodInfluentialHohenberger, C., Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2019) · Financial Planning Review · doi:10.1002/cfp2.1047 · Cited by 123
Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. Κ., & Schmitt‐Rodermund, E. (2012) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00015.x · Cited by 114
Examining the Cultural Specificity of Approaches To Learning in Universities in Hong Kong and Sydney
Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022107313905 · Cited by 98
“It was revealed that the univariate skewness and kurtosis values of the indicators approximately ranged within ±1.0, and hence the data were considered to approximate a normal distribution (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialCury, F., Fonséca, D. D., Rufo, M., & Sarrazin, P. G. (2002) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.233 · Cited by 115
Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles
Xiao, J., & Goulias, K. G. (2022) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.007 · Cited by 110
Self‐Efficacy to Use Condoms in Unmarried Latino Adults
Marín, B. V., Tschann, J. M., Gomez, C. A., & Gregorich, S. E. (1998) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1021882107615 · Cited by 99
The Relative Age Effect and Its Influence on Academic Performance
Navarro, J. J., García-Rubio, J., & Olivares, P. R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141895 · Cited by 98
“In this sense, given that the sample size is greater than 1,000 subjects [33], it is decided to apply an asymptotically distribution-free estimation method [32].”
MethodSacker, A., Bartley, M., Firth, D., & Fitzpatrick, R. M. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00176-3 · Cited by 99
Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attachment Style Questionnaires
Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A., & Wilkinson, R. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407510373756 · Cited by 98
“The data were multivariate normal; thus Maximum Likelihood Estimation was employed.”
MethodMottola, G. R., Bachman, B. A., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01809.x · Cited by 98
Alwin, D. F. (1992) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270993 · Cited by 98
Taylor, A. B., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405278580 · Cited by 97
“This finding parallels the results of Muthén and Kaplan (1985), who found that maximum likelihood estimation performed adequately on ordered categorical outcome variables having at least five categories.”
ResultSlocum, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9303-y · Cited by 97
What influences children's and adolescents' understanding of the complexity of the Internet?
Yan, Z. (2006) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.418 · Cited by 97
“Univariate skewnesses and kurtoses were found to be acceptable within the range of 1.0 (Bollen, 1989; Muthen & Kaplan, 1985) for all the variables except for Classes, skewness Z 1.316, kurtosis Z .462.”
InfluentialKriston, L., Schäfer, J., Jacob, G., Härter, M., & Hölzel, L. (2013) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000143 · Cited by 113
Bae, J., & Bachman, L. F. (1998) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229801500304 · Cited by 96
Wu, C. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.5.535-552 · Cited by 96
Shill, M. A., & Lumley, M. A. (2002) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1348/147608302169607 · Cited by 95
Measurement invariance with respect to ethnicity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Baas, K. D., Cramer, A. O. J., Koeter, M. W. J., van de Lisdonk, E. H., van Weert, H. C. P. M., & Schene, A. H. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.026 · Cited by 95
“Because the WLS estimator requires large samples for adequate performance we also used a Weighted Least Squares Mean and Variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator for subsamples (Flora and Curran, 2004; Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodMarsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., Abdelfattah, F. A., Nagengast, B., & Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037485 · Cited by 97
“…of fit that were robust in relation to nonnormality of observations and the use of Likert responses where there were at least four or more response categories, particularly where nonnormality was not excessive (e.g., Beauducel & Herzberg, 2006; DiStefano, 2002; Dolan, 1994; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
Whiteside-Mansell, L., & CORWYN, R. F. (2003) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164402239323 · Cited by 93
“|) or kurtosis (all variables with values < |1.2|), indicating that the use of ML estimation was appropriate (Muthen & Kaplan, 1985).”
MethodInfluentialSmith, D. B., Hanges, P. J., & Dickson, M. W. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.304 · Cited by 93
A two-study validation of a single-item measure of relationship satisfaction: RAS-1
Fülöp, F., Bőthe, B., Gál, É., Cachia, J. Y. A., Demetrovics, Z., & Orosz, G. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00727-y · Cited by 94
Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior Problem Scores
Guttmannova, K., Szanyi, J., & Cali, P. W. (2008) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164407310127 · Cited by 82
“Maximum likelihood (ML) has been shown to produce biased estimates when the distributional requirements are seriously violated, particularly with nonnormal ordinal data (e.g., Lubke & Muthén, 2004; Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundCarlet, F. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.007 · Cited by 95
Morata-Ramirez, M. Á., & Tello, F. P. H. (2013) · International Journal of Social Science Studies · doi:10.11114/ijsss.v1i1.27 · Cited by 91
“According to Muthén and Kaplan (1985) the limit of skewness in real data is around ± 2.”
BackgroundMethodValidation of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument: An Application of the Korean Version
Choi, Y. S., Seo, M., Scott, D., & Martin, J. J. (2010) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.24.2.169 · Cited by 91
The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM–5 pathological personality traits.
Morey, L. C., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034003 · Cited by 93
Department of Community Medicine
顏齊慧 (2010) · Cited by 90
Motivational Predictors of Change in Oral Health: An Experimental Test of Self-Determination Theory
Halvari, A. E. M., & Halvari, H. (2006) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9035-8 · Cited by 101
Kenny, M. E., Moilanen, D. L., Lomax, R. G., & Brabeck, M. (1993) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431693013004004 · Cited by 94
A study on the mediating role of intention in the impact of habit and attitude on meat consumption
Saba, A., & Natale, R. D. (1998) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00039-1 · Cited by 88
Co-occurrence of aggressive behavior and rule-breaking behavior at age 12: Multi-rater analyses
Bartels, M., Hudziak, J. J., van den Oord, E. J. C. G., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Rietveld, M. J. H., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1025787019702 · Cited by 87
“After transformation, all skewness and kurtosis indices were between −1.0 and 1.0, implying that not much distortion is to be expected (Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialReligious coping, stress, and quality of life of Muslim university students in New Zealand
Gardner, T. M., Krägeloh, C. U., & Henning, M. A. (2013) · Mental Health Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13674676.2013.804044 · Cited by 87
“These six items also had skewness and kurtosis values that were well outside the negligible range of 1.00 to −1.00 (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialKrägeloh, C. U., Chai, P. P. M., Shepherd, D., & Billington, R. (2010) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9416-x · Cited by 92
“The majority of kurtosis and skewness values for the Brief COPE sub-scales were within the negligible range of -1.00 to 1.00 (Muthén and Kaplan 1985), and those outside this range were still well below the levels at which deviations from normality become problematic (Curran et al. 1996).”
InfluentialFear of Self and Unacceptable Thoughts in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder
Melli, G., Aardema, F., & Moulding, R. (2015) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.1950 · Cited by 86
“Confirmatory Factor Structure Analysis A substantial number of items showed values of skewness and kurtosis that fell outside the [ 1; +1] range recommended by Muthén and Kaplan (1985) for using maximum likelihood estimator in factor analyses.”
MethodThe Eating Disorders Continuum, Self‐Esteem, and Perfectionism
Peck, L. D., & Lightsey, O. R. (2008) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00496.x · Cited by 85
Validation of the Pediatric Catatonia Rating Scale (PCRS)
Benarous, X., Consoli, A., Raffin, M., Bodeau, N., Giannitelli, M., Cohen, D., & Olliac, B. (2016) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.06.020 · Cited by 85
“Such a discrepancy can arise from methodological differences between studies due to the diversity in samples (e.g., including or not including somatic diseases), the nature of the scale used (Sienaert et al., 2011), and the method of statistical extraction (Muthén and Kaplan, 1985).”
Ogliari, A. L., Citterio, A., Zanoni, A., Fagnani, C., Patriarca, V., Cirrincione, R., Stazi, M. A., & Battaglia, M. (2005) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.11.004 · Cited by 85
Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Campbell, T. L. (1993) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0302_2 · Cited by 85
Tay, A. K., Rees, S. J., Chen, J., Kareth, M., & Silove, D. M. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0480-3 · Cited by 84
“CFA models were estimated using the robust mean- and variance-adjusted Weighted Least Square method (WLSMV), an established statistical procedure recommended for analyzing dichotomous variables [35,36] applied extensively in past studies [37,38].”
MethodBertrand, J., Bedetti, C., Postuma, R. B., Monchi, O., Marchand, D. G., Jubault, T., & Gagnon, J. (2012) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25272 · Cited by 84
Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Different Correlation Types and Estimation Methods
Schumacker, R. E., & Beyerlein, S. T. (2000) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0704_6 · Cited by 84
“However, the normal-theory chi-square fit function and the standard errors are not robust (Muthén & Kaplan, 1985), plus the problem of nonpositive definite matrices plaques the use of polychoric correlations in factor analysis.”
BackgroundEthological confirmatory factor analysis of anxiety-like behaviour in the murine elevated plus-maze
Wall, P. M., & Messier, C. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00229-1 · Cited by 83
Orosz, G., Tóth‐Király, I., Büki, N., Ivaskevics, K., Bőthe, B., & Fülöp, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779 · Cited by 81
“…studies (e.g., Fahlman et al., 2013; Bőthe et al., 2018): (1) corrected item-total correlations, (2) normality in terms of skewness and kurtosis (Muthén and Kaplan, 1985; Curran et al., 1996), and (3) content validity (Haynes et al., 1995) compared to the other items and competition in general.”
BackgroundThe 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome
Atroshi, I., Lyrén, P., & Gummesson, C. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9449-3 · Cited by 81
“While ML estimation with non-normal (kurtotic) data may produce biased chi-square based fit values and standard error estimates, it still tends to yield stable factor coefficients [24-26].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Muthén, Bengt
- ORCID
- Muthén, Bengt
- Venue
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-189
- ISSN
- 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8317
- OpenAlex
- W1985442257
- Cited by
- 1,778
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- factor analysis, Likert scale data, kurtosis, maximum likelihood estimation, generalized least squares, standard error bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review