Cited by 27Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementRural Development and Agriculture

Convergence on Cattle: Political Ecology, Social Group Perceptions, and Socioeconomic Relationships in A cre, B razil

Hoelle, Jeffrey·2011·Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment

Abstract

Cattle raising is currently the leading cause of deforestation in A mazonia, and an increasingly appealing and profitable way for a growing number of smallholders to make a living in the western A mazon state of A cre, B razil. The A crean rubber tapper social movement contested the arrival of cattle ranchers in the 1970s and 1980s, but cattle raising has expanded among smallholder groups, including the rubber tappers, over the past 20 years. Building on the legacy of political–economic analyses of Amazonian cattle raising, this study argues for an expanded view of cattle raising by incorporating perspectives on the cultural constructions surrounding cattle and intergroup socioeconomic relationships. Data obtained from surveys and participant observation are used to examine the factors that have contributed to the expansion of cattle raising across three A crean groups, each historically distinguished by their unique forms of livelihood and associated identities: forest‐extractivist rubber tappers, agricultural colonists, and large‐scale ranchers. It is argued that three factors have contributed to the growth of cattle ranching among these groups: political and economic shifts, which have made agricultural and extractive livelihoods less competitive with cattle raising; the spread of positive cultural views surrounding cattle raising; and the transition of intergroup relationships from conflict to cooperation in the cattle industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2153-9561.2011.01053.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoelle, J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Hoelle, Jeffrey
Venue
Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
95-106
ISSN
  • 2153-9553 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-9561
OpenAlex
W1933794766
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
cattle ranching, cattle farming, Acre, Amazon deforestation, rubber tappers, intergroup relations, livelihood diversification, political ecology, social movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review