Convergence on Cattle: Political Ecology, Social Group Perceptions, and Socioeconomic Relationships in A cre, B razil
Abstract
Cattle raising is currently the leading cause of deforestation in A mazonia, and an increasingly appealing and profitable way for a growing number of smallholders to make a living in the western A mazon state of A cre, B razil. The A crean rubber tapper social movement contested the arrival of cattle ranchers in the 1970s and 1980s, but cattle raising has expanded among smallholder groups, including the rubber tappers, over the past 20 years. Building on the legacy of political–economic analyses of Amazonian cattle raising, this study argues for an expanded view of cattle raising by incorporating perspectives on the cultural constructions surrounding cattle and intergroup socioeconomic relationships. Data obtained from surveys and participant observation are used to examine the factors that have contributed to the expansion of cattle raising across three A crean groups, each historically distinguished by their unique forms of livelihood and associated identities: forest‐extractivist rubber tappers, agricultural colonists, and large‐scale ranchers. It is argued that three factors have contributed to the growth of cattle ranching among these groups: political and economic shifts, which have made agricultural and extractive livelihoods less competitive with cattle raising; the spread of positive cultural views surrounding cattle raising; and the transition of intergroup relationships from conflict to cooperation in the cattle industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For smaller ranchers, the cultural value of ranching and its social embeddedness is a more potent explanation of land use choices.
“For these smaller ranchers the cultural value of ranching and its social embeddedness (Hoelle 2011) is a more potent explanation of land use choices.”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Hoelle 2011
The prestige associated with cattle ranching in Amazonia can mask its low returns, creating an informational and cultural barrier to change.
“The prestige associated with cattle ranching in Amazonia can mask its low returns, creating an informational and cultural barrier to change (Hoelle 2011, Gomes et al. 2012).”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Hoelle 2011
Cattle ownership has been long viewed as a status symbol in Latin American culture.
“Third, cattle ownership has been long viewed as a status symbol in Latin American culture (Walker et al. 2000, Hoelle 2011).”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Hoelle 2011
Cites
Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture
Netting, R. M. (1993) · doi:10.1515/9781503622067 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoelle, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoelle, Jeffrey
- ORCID
- Hoelle, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-106
- ISSN
- 2153-9553 (ISSN-L)
- 2153-9561
- OpenAlex
- W1933794766
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Culture Agriculture Food and Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Keywords
- cattle ranching, cattle farming, Acre, Amazon deforestation, rubber tappers, intergroup relations, livelihood diversification, political ecology, social movements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review