The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian “Confidence Intervals” for the Cross-Validated Smoothing Spline
Abstract
SUMMARY: We consider the model Y(ti)=g(ti) + ∈i, i = 1, 2, …, n, where g(t), t ∈ [0, 1] is a smooth function and the {∈i} are independent N(0, σ2) errors with σ2 unknown. The cross-validated smoothing spline can be used to estimate g non-parametrically from observations on Y(ti), i= 1, 2, …, n, and the purpose of this paper is to study confidence intervals for this estimate. Properties of smoothing splines as Bayes estimates are used to derive confidence intervals based on the posterior covariance function of the estimate. A small Monte Carlo study with the cubic smoothing spline is carried out to suggest by example to what extent the resulting 95 per cent confidence intervals can be expected to cover about 95 per cent of the true (but in practice unknown) values of g(ti), i= 1,2,…,n. The method was also applied to one example of a two-dimensional thin plate smoothing spline. An asymptotic theoretical argument is presented to explain why the method can be expected to work on fixed smooth functions (like those tried), which are “smoother” than the sample functions from the prior distributions on which the confidence interval theory is based.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Self-citation
Cited by
Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353 · Cited by 151
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models
Wood, S. N., Pya, N., & Säfken, B. (2016) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986 · Cited by 1,312
Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines
Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., & Welham, S. J. (1999) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00154 · Cited by 570
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahba, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-09-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-150
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W141760394
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian “Confidence Intervals” for the Cross-Validated Smoothing Spline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01239.x
- The paper
- Wahba, G. (1983). Bayesian “Confidence Intervals” for the Cross-Validated Smoothing Spline. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01239.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.