Cited by 570Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceOptimal Experimental Design MethodsAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines

Verbyla, Arũnas P., Cullis, Brian R., Kenward, Michael G., Welham, Sue J.·1999·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics

Abstract

SUMMARY: In designed experiments and in particular longitudinal studies, the aim may be to assess the effect of a quantitative variable such as time on treatment effects. Modelling treatment effects can be complex in the presence of other sources of variation. Three examples are presented to illustrate an approach to analysis in such cases. The first example is a longitudinal experiment on the growth of cows under a factorial treatment structure where serial correlation and variance heterogeneity complicate the analysis. The second example involves the calibration of optical density and the concentration of a protein DNase in the presence of sampling variation and variance heterogeneity. The final example is a multienvironment agricultural field experiment in which a yield–seeding rate relationship is required for several varieties of lupins. Spatial variation within environments, heterogeneity between environments and variation between varieties all need to be incorporated in the analysis. In this paper, the cubic smoothing spline is used in conjunction with fixed and random effects, random coefficients and variance modelling to provide simultaneous modelling of trends and covariance structure. The key result that allows coherent and flexible empirical model building in complex situations is the linear mixed model representation of the cubic smoothing spline. An extension is proposed in which trend is partitioned into smooth and non-smooth components. Estimation and inference, the analysis of the three examples and a discussion of extensions and unresolved issues are also presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9876.00154

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [19]19. Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R., Cullis, B. R. and Welham, S. J. (1996) ASREML. Biometric Bulletin. New South Wales Agriculture, Wagga Wagga.
  2. [28]28. Kenward, M. G. and Welham, S. J. (1995) Use of splines in random coecient regression models for the analysis of repeated measurements. In Proc. Symp. Statistical Software 95, pp. 95±112. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
  3. [42]42. Searle, S. R., Casella, G. and McCulloch, C. E. (1992) Variance Components. New York: Wiley.
  4. [60]60. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987) Empirical Modelling and Response Surfaces. New York: Wiley.
  5. [65]65. Diggle, P. J., Liang, K.-Y. and Zeger, S. L. (1994) Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Clarendon.
  6. [66]66. Durban, M. (1999) Modelling spatial trends and local competition eects using semiparametric additive models. PhD Thesis. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., & Welham, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Adelaide and South Australian Research and Development Institute , Glen Osmond , Australia
  • New South Wales Agriculture , Wagga Wagga , Australia
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
269-311
ISSN
  • 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9876
OpenAlex
W2153287720
Cited by
570
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
26.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Funders
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
  • University of Adelaide
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
smoothing splines, longitudinal data, designed experiments, linear mixed models, random coefficients, heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, cubic spline smoothing, seeding rate, spatial variability, fixed and random effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review