The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local structure of the Mg x Ni x Co x Cu x Zn x O( x =0.2) entropy‐stabilized oxide: An EXAFS study
Abstract
Entropy‐stabilized oxides (ESOs) provide an alternative route to novel materials discovery and synthesis. It is, however, a challenge to demonstrate that the constituent elements in an entropy‐stabilized crystal are homogeneously and randomly dispersed among a particular sublattice, resulting in a true solid solution with no evidence of local order or clustering. In this work, we present the application and analysis of extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) on the prototype ESO composition Mg x Ni x Co x Cu x Zn x O ( x =0.2). In so doing, we can quantify the local atomic structure on an element‐by‐element basis. We conclude that local bond lengths between metal and oxygen vary around each absorbing cation, with notable distortion around the Cu–O polyhedra. By the second near neighbor (i.e., the cation‐cation pair), interatomic distances are uniform to the extent that the collected data can resolve. Crystal models that best fit the experimental scattering data include cations that are distributed randomly on an FCC sublattice with minimal positional disorder, with an interleaved FCC anion sublattice with oxygen ions displaced from the ideal locations to accommodate the distortions in the cation polyhedra. Density functional theory calculations of the ESO system yield a significant broadening in the positional distribution for the oxygen sublattice compared to that for the cation sublattice for all peaks, showing consistency with the conclusion from the experimental data that the distortion from an ideal rock salt structure occurs primarily through disorder in the oxygen sublattice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Cited by
Oses, C., Toher, C., & Curtarolo, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0170-8 · Cited by 2,081
High‐Entropy Oxides: Fundamental Aspects and Electrochemical Properties
Sarkar, A., Wang, Q., Schiele, A., Chellali, M. R., Bhattacharya, S. S., Wang, D., Brezesinski, T., Hahn, H., Velasco, L., & Breitung, B. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201806236 · Cited by 1,234
High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward
Xiang, H., Xing, Y., Dai, F.-Z., Wang, H., Su, L., Miao, L., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Qi, X., Yao, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Ceramics · doi:10.1007/s40145-021-0477-y · Cited by 1,109
High-entropy ceramics: Review of principles, production and applications
Akrami, S., Edalati, P., Fuji, M., & Edalati, K. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2021.100644 · Cited by 1,008
Review of high entropy ceramics: design, synthesis, structure and properties
Zhang, R.-Z., & Reece, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta05698j · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Rost, C. M., Rak, Z., Brenner, D. W., & Maria, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2732-2738
- ISSN
- 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2605616860
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local structure of the Mg x Ni x Co x Cu x Zn x O( x =0.2) entropy‐stabilized oxide: An EXAFS study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jace.14756
- The paper
- Rost, C. M., Rak, Z., Brenner, D. W., & Maria, J. (2017). Local structure of the Mg x Ni x Co x Cu x Zn x O( x =0.2) entropy‐stabilized oxide: An EXAFS study. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.