The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial inactivation by high-voltage atmospheric cold plasma: influence of process parameters and effects on cell leakage and DNA
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: This study investigated a range of atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) process parameters for bacterial inactivation with further investigation of selected parameters on cell membrane integrity and DNA damage. The effects of high voltage levels, mode of exposure, gas mixture and treatment time against Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes were examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: 10(8) CFU ml(-1) E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli NCTC 12900 and L. monocytogenes NCTC11994 were ACP-treated in 10 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Working gas mixtures used were air (gas mix 1), 90% N2 + 10% O2 (gas mix 2) and 65% O2 + 30% CO2 + 5% N2 (gas mix 3). Greater reduction of viability was observed for all strains using higher voltage of 70 kVRMS and with working gas mixtures with higher oxygen content in combination with direct exposure. Indirect ACP exposure for 30 s inactivated below detection level both E. coli strains. L. monocytogenes inactivation within 30 s was irrespective of the mode of exposure. Leakage was assessed using A260 absorbance, and DNA damage was monitored using PCR and gel electrophoresis. Membrane integrity was compromised after 5 s, with noticeable DNA damage also dependent on the target cell after 30 s. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma treatment was effective for inactivation of challenge micro-organisms, with a greater sensitivity of L. monocytogenes noted. Different damage patterns were observed for the different bacterial strains attributed to the membrane structure and potential resistance mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Using atmospheric air as working gas resulted in useful inactivation by comparison with high nitrogen or high oxygen mix. The mechanism of inactivation was a function of treatment duration and cell membrane characteristics, thus offering potential for optimized process parameters specific to the microbial challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Han, L., Patil, S., Boehm, D., Milosavljević, V., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02660-15 · Cited by 435
Self-citationXu, L., Garner, A. L., Tao, B., & Keener, K. M. (2017) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-017-1947-7 · Cited by 205
Self-citationMahnot, N. K., Mahanta, C. L., Keener, K. M., & Misra, N. N. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.084 · Cited by 81
Self-citationMahnot, N. K., Mahanta, C. L., Farkas, B. E., Keener, K. M., & Misra, N. N. (2019) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.004 · Cited by 63
Self-citationRothrock, M. J., Zhuang, H., Lawrence, K. C., Bowker, B. C., Gamble, G. R., & Hiett, K. L. (2017) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-016-1158-x · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, H., Patil, S., Keener, K. M., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-21
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 784-794
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124079663
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial inactivation by high-voltage atmospheric cold plasma: influence of process parameters and effects on cell leakage and DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jam.12426
- The paper
- Lu, H., Patil, S., Keener, K. M., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P. (2014). Bacterial inactivation by high-voltage atmospheric cold plasma: influence of process parameters and effects on cell leakage and DNA. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.