Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 685

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The nursing profession: public image, self‐concept and professional identity. A discussion paper

Open access
Hoeve, Yvonne ten, Jansen, Gerard, Roodbol, Petrie·2014·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim: To discuss the actual public image of nurses and other factors that influence the development of nurses' self‐concept and professional identity. Background: Nurses have become healthcare professionals in their own right who possess a great deal of knowledge. However, the public does not always value the skills and competences nurses have acquired through education and innovation. Design: Discussion paper. Data sources: We identified 1216 relevant studies by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL and Psyc INFO databases in the period 1997–2010. Finally, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Discussion: The included studies show that the actual public image of nursing is diverse and incongruous. This image is partly self‐created by nurses due to their invisibility and their lack of public discourse. Nurses derive their self‐concept and professional identity from their public image, work environment, work values, education and traditional social and cultural values. Implications for nursing: Nurses should work harder to communicate their professionalism to the public. Social media like the Internet and YouTube can be used to show the public what they really do. Conclusion: To improve their public image and to obtain a stronger position in healthcare organizations, nurses need to increase their visibility. This could be realized by ongoing education and a challenging work environment that encourages nurses to stand up for themselves. Furthermore, nurses should make better use of strategic positions, such as case manager, nurse educator or clinical nurse specialist and use their professionalism to show the public what their work really entails.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.12177

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 685

Metadata

Authors
Hoeve, Y. T., Jansen, G., & Roodbol, P.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-26
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
295-309
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2163800176
Cited by
685
References
26
FWCI
58.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nursing profession: public image, self‐concept and professional identity. A discussion paper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jan.12177
The paper
Hoeve, Y. T., Jansen, G., & Roodbol, P. (2014). The nursing profession: public image, self‐concept and professional identity. A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.