Cited by 39Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationMethodologies in Health Research and PracticeNursing education and management

A critique of concept analysis

Draper, Peter·2014·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

I argue that there is no place for concept analysis in the scholarship of modern nursing. Although it may have played a role in the intellectual history of our profession, concept analysis is methodologically weak and philosophically dubious. Furthermore, there is no evidence that it has made a contribution to patient care. Concept analysis looked promising in the turbulent days of the 1980s. Nursing practice was being transformed by the introduction of the nursing process and primary nursing. Many changes were driven by an infusion of intellectual energy from newly formed university departments of nursing. Nursing research began to flourish and nursing theories and models were discussed passionately. We were confident that – within a decade or two – nursing would have its unique knowledge base, the ultimate mark of a true profession. Our knowledge base would be built 'from the ground up'. Concept analysis would help us to describe the key elements of nursing practice and we would explore the relationships between concepts through programmes of empirical research. In time, we would build theories and conceptual models and these would feedback to improve practice in a virtuous circle of professional development. Some elements of this vision have, indeed, flourished. In many countries, nursing education is embedded in universities. Nursing research is vibrant, and nurses have played a leading part in the development of evidence-based practice. Other aspects of the prospectus ha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.12280

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draper, P.
Affiliations
University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Draper, Peter
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1207-1208
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2146505975
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
conceptual analysis, nursing knowledge base, nursing theory, nursing models, nursing research, nursing profession, nursing process, primary nursing, nursing education, evidence-based practice, globalization of knowledge, nursing journals, nursing philosophy, epistemology of nursing, nursing as a discipline
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Humans, Nursing Care, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review