Nurses' perceptions of transgressive behaviour in care relationships: a qualitative study
Abstract
Aim: To acquire insight into the onset and meaning of transgressive behaviour from the perspective of nurses. Background: Patient aggression towards healthcare providers occurs frequently. Nurses in particular are at risk of encountering aggressive or transgressive behaviour due to the nature, duration and intensity of relationships with patients. This study analysed nurse perspectives with regard to the onset and meaning of transgressive patient behaviour in a general hospital setting. Design: Qualitative research according to the grounded theory method. Methods: Data were collected in 2011 through individual interviews with 18 nurses who were selected using purposive and theoretical sampling. Findings: Findings revealed that various nurse‐patient interactions can result in episodes of transgressive behaviour, depending on the interplay of determining and regulating factors which have been identified at the patient, nurse and ward level. Experiences of transgressive behaviour are influenced by degree of control nurses experience over the provision of care; the degree of patient acceptance of organizational and ward rules, the degree of gratitude and recognition expressed by the patient and the extent of patient regard for the nurse as a person. Factors affecting transgressive experiences were a trusting relationship between patient and nurse; the extent to which patient perspectives are understood; methods of managing transgressive behaviour; and the influence of the team, head nurse and ward culture and habits. Conclusions: The results of this study can support the development of nurses' coping ability and self‐confidence to mitigate or prevent experiences of transgressive behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a number of studies, saturation is claimed, but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to confirm or validate this claim.
“In a number of studies, saturation is claimed, but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to ‘confirm’ (Jassim and Whitford 2014: p. 191; Forsberg et al. 2000: p. 328) or ‘validate’ (Vandecasteele et al. 2015: p. 2789) this claim”
From Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2018) · cites this paper as Vandecasteele et al. 2015
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Understanding aggressive behaviour across the lifespan
LIU, J., LEWIS, G., & EVANS, L. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01902.x · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 · Cited by 12,033 · see citing works
“…but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to ‘confirm’ (Jassim and Whitford 2014: p. 191; Forsberg et al. 2000: p. 328) or ‘validate’ (Vandecasteele et al. 2015: p. 2789) this claim; for example: After the 10th interview, there were no new themes generated from the interviews.”
Background
- Authors
- Vandecasteele, T., Debyser, B., Van Hecke, A., De Backer, T., Beeckman, D., & Verhaeghe, S.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Katholieke Hogeschool Vives (BE)
- University Centre for Nursing & Midwifery Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University Belgium
- Department of Health Care VIVES University College Roeselare Belgium
- Corresponding author
- Vandecasteele, Tina
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2786-2798
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1594096578
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Ghent
- VIVES University College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- transgression, patient aggression, nurse-patient relationship, nurses' perceptions, ward culture, coping with aggression, general hospital nursing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aggression, Attitude of Health Personnel, Belgium, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patients, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Workplace Violence, Grounded Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review