Cited by 16Mental Health and Patient InvolvementParticipatory Visual Research MethodsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Service user engagement: a co-created interview schedule exploring mental health recovery in young adults

Open access
McCauley, Claire‐Odile, McKenna, Hugh, Keeney, Sinead, McLaughlin, Derek·2017·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to co-create of an interview schedule exploring mental health recovery in collaboration with young adult service users. BACKGROUND: Service user involvement in research has been increasingly recognized as providing a vital authentic insight into mental health recovery. Engagement and collaboration with service users have facilitated the exploration of inaccessible or under-investigated aspects of the lived experience of mental health recovery, not only directing the trajectory of research, but making it relevant to their own contextual experience. DESIGN: A qualitative content analysis framework was employed in the co-creation of a semi-structured interview schedule through an engagement process with service users. METHODS: Two separate engagement groups took place at the premises of the service user organizations, between January - February 2014. Miles and Huberman's analysis framework was chosen for this phase as it enabled the visual presentation of factors, concepts or variables and the established relationship between them. RESULTS: The lived experience of mental ill health in young adulthood and how this was understood by others was a particularly relevant theme for participants. Further themes were identified between the impact of painful experiences at this developmental life stage leading to a deeper understanding of others through finding meaning in their own mental health recovery journey. CONCLUSION: Our findings identified that suffering painful experiences is an integral aspect in the process of mental health recovery. This understanding has particular relevance to mental health nursing practice, ensuring the care delivered is cognizant of the suffering or painful experiences that young adults are encountering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.13314

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCauley, C., McKenna, H., Keeney, S., & McLaughlin, D.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
McCauley, Claire‐Odile
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-11
Volume
73
Issue
10
Pages
2361-2372
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2604250355
Cited by
16
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Northern Ireland Assembly's Department of Education and Learning
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental health recovery, young adults, service user engagement, meaning-making, psychiatric nursing practice
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Northern Ireland, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review