Cited by 93Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesOccupational Health and Burnout

Factors influencing nurse‐assessed quality nursing care: A cross‐sectional study in hospitals

Liu, Ying, Aungsuroch, Yupin·2018·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim: To propose a hypothesized theoretical model and apply it to examine the structural relationships among work environment, patient‐to‐nurse ratio, job satisfaction, burnout, intention to leave and quality nursing care. Background: Improving quality nursing care is a first consideration in nursing management globally. A better understanding of factors influencing quality nursing care can help hospital administrators implement effective programmes to improve quality of services. Although certain bivariate correlations have been found between selected factors and quality nursing care in different study models, no studies have examined the relationships among work environment, patient‐to‐nurse ratio, job satisfaction, burnout, intention to leave and quality nursing care in a more comprehensive theoretical model. Design: A cross‐sectional survey. Methods: The questionnaires were collected from 510 Chinese nurses in four Chinese tertiary hospitals in January 2015. The validity and internal consistency reliability of research instruments were evaluated. Structural equation modelling was used to test a theoretical model. Results: The findings revealed that the data supported the theoretical model. Work environment had a large total effect size on quality nursing care. Burnout largely and directly influenced quality nursing care, which was followed by work environment and patient‐to‐nurse ratio. Job satisfaction indirectly affected quality nursing care through burnout. Conclusions: This study shows how work environment past burnout and job satisfaction influences quality nursing care. Apart from nurses’ work conditions of work environment and patient‐to‐nurse ratio, hospital administrators should pay more attention to nurse outcomes of job satisfaction and burnout when designing intervention programmes to improve quality nursing care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.13507

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative work environments affect burnout measured with a composite score via job dissatisfaction.

    “Negative work environments affected burnout (measured with a composite score) via job dissatisfaction [96]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [96]

  • Burnout measured on a composite score is associated with a higher intention to leave.

    “Burnout measured on a composite score was associated with a higher intention to leave [96]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [96]

  • Higher levels of job satisfaction are associated with a lower level of composite burnout scores.

    “three treated job satisfaction as a predictor of burnout and concluded that higher levels of job satisfaction were associated with a lower level of composite burnout scores [52, 96]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [96]

  • A high burnout composite score predicts poor nurse-assessed quality of care.

    “A high burnout composite score predicted poor nurse-assessed quality of care [96]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [96]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., & Aungsuroch, Y.
Affiliations
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Ying
  • Aungsuroch, Yupin
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
935-945
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2770790177
Cited by
93
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chulalongkorn University
  • Chinese Medical Association (2016B‐HL030)
  • Department of Education of Liaoning Province
  • York University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
nursing care quality, nurse burnout, job satisfaction, nurse-to-patient ratio, work environment, turnover intention, nurse retention, hospital nursing staff, theoretical model
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Care, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Workplace, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review