Cited by 30Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchFamily and Disability Support ResearchResilience and Mental Health

Risk and Resilience Factors in the Mental Health and Well‐Being of Women with Intellectual Disability

Conder, Jennifer Ann, Mirfin‐Veitch, Brigit Frances, Gates, Sue·2015·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background: Women with intellectual disability are thought to be at increased risk of mental illness, yet little is known about resiliency factors supporting women's mental health. This article reports on such factors drawn from a study that aimed to address how women with intellectual disability experience their mental health and well‐being. Materials and Methods: Utilizing a broad qualitative approach, 25 New Zealand women, aged 21–65 years were interviewed about their life from childhood to the present, including, where relevant, their experience of mental illness. Data were analysed using a general inductive approach. Results: Resiliency factors aligned with the theme ‘keeping mentally well’, subthemes of which were as follows: the importance of relationships with family and friends; keeping busy; and autonomy and happiness. Challenges for resiliency could be seen in the theme ‘mental illness’ where subthemes of abuse, long‐term stress and medication were identified. Conclusions: Many of the women demonstrated remarkable resiliency, despite setbacks and exposure to risks, provided they were nested within a supportive context. Those women who experienced major mental illness shared evidence of both higher risk factors and less support available at crucial times.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jar.12153

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conder, J. A., Mirfin‐Veitch, B. F., & Gates, S.
Affiliations
Donald Beasley Institute (NZ)
Corresponding author
Conder, Jennifer Ann
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
572-583
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2041815062
Cited by
30
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lotteries Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
women with intellectual disabilities, mental health, well-being, resilience, risk factors, mental illness, family relationships, social support, autonomy, happiness, abuse, long-term stress, medication, life course
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Risk Factors, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review