The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Seeing is believing: communication modality, anger, and support for action on behalf of out‐groups
Abstract
Relatively few studies have investigated the impact of communication modality (e.g., video vs. print) on political action intentions, as well as what motivates external observers to act when both the victim and perpetrator of injustice are out‐group members. The present research experimentally investigated the influence of communication modality of an injustice (text vs. video), where all parties were out‐group members, on observers' sympathy, anger, social cohesion to victims, and political action intentions. Participants reported greater intentions to politically act in the video condition, relative to print, which was explained by increased anger in the video condition. In addition, both sympathy and anger were positively related to social cohesion to the out‐group, but only anger was associated with political action intentions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“research demonstrates that videos, especially videos of an injustice, elicit more engagement and emotional reactions (e.g., anger, sympathy) than text descriptions displaying the same information22–24”
From Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.434 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1 · DOI
- 10.1348/135910700168856 · DOI
- Chaiken S., 1976, Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 606, 10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.605 · DOI
- 10.1111/0162-895X.00304 · DOI
- 10.1177/135910539700200215 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872 · DOI
- Dovidio J. F., 1991, Prosocial behavior, 86
- 10.1007/BF01499042 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.777 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167207309193 · DOI
- Klandermans B., 2000, Collective helping in modern society, 162
- Leach C. W., 2002, Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration, 136
- 10.1037/a0012634 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167204271651 · DOI
- 10.1002/casp.916 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01048081 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-4560.00272 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0011989 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/acp.1578 · DOI
- Power S., 2007, A problem from hell: America and the age of genocide
- 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_3 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699930302288 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1007640925819 · DOI
- Slovic P., 2007, “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide, Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 1, 10.1017/S1930297500000061 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167206287363 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868308323223 · DOI
- Thomas E. F., 2005, The role of social identity in creating positive beliefs and emotions to motivate volunteerism, Australian Journal on Volunteering, 10, 45
- 10.1177/1088868309343290 · DOI
- Wellens A. R.(1989).Effects of telecommunication media upon information sharing team performance: Some theoretical and empirical observations.IEEE AES Magazine (September) 13–19. · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1202 · DOI
- Wright S. C., 2009, Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities, 291
- 10.1007/s12528-011-9042-y · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasford, D. E.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glasford, Demis E.
- ORCID
- Glasford, Demis E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-18
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2223-2230
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W1504846816
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- communication modality, outgroup, anger, sympathy, social cohesion, injustice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
