Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The southern coastal Beringian land bridge: cryptic refugium or pseudorefugium for woody plants during the Last Glacial Maximum?

Wang, Yue, Heintzman, Peter D., Newsom, Lee, Bigelow, Nancy H., Wooller, Matthew J., Shapiro, Beth, Williams, John W.·2017·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: The Bering Land Bridge (BLB) connected Asia and North America during glacial periods, supported a diverse ecosystem of now‐vanished megafauna, and is a proposed glacial refugium. This study tests whether southern coastal Beringia was a refugium for woody taxa during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and hypotheses about habitats available on the BLB before and after megafaunal extinction. Location: St. Paul Island, Alaska. Methods: We analysed sediment cores from the Lake Hill, with a new age model anchored by 18 radiocarbon dates and multiple palaeoecological indicators (sedimentary ancient DNA [seda DNA], macrobotanical fossils, and pollen) for the presence/absence of four woody genera: Picea, Betula, Alnus and Salix. We reconstructed vegetation history and compare St. Paul tundra composition to mainland counterparts. Results: St. Paul has been continuously occupied by graminoid‐forb tundra with prostrate shrubs (Salix, Ericaceae) since 18,000 years before present (yr bp). Fossil pollen of Picea, Pinus, Betula and Alnus is present in the Lake Hill sediments at low relative abundances and accumulation rates, consistent with long‐distance transport. Macrobotanical fossils and seda DNA analyses do not support Picea, Betula and Alnus presence. The St. Paul modern and fossil pollen assemblages are compositionally unlike mainland counterparts, but most closely resemble Arctic herbaceous tundra. Stratigraphically constrained cluster analysis indicates no major change in the vegetation after woolly mammoth extinction at 5600 yr bp, although Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Equisetum and forb abundances increase. Main conclusions: This study strongly indicates that St. Paul and, by implication, southern coastal Beringia were not refugia for woody taxa during the LGM. The persistence of prostrate shrub‐graminoid tundra supports interpretations that herbaceous tundra prevailed on southern Beringia during the LGM, whilst not ruling out the possibility of mesic shrub tundra in the interior. This herbaceous tundra supported an island refugium for woolly mammoth for 8000 years, showing no major vegetation composition changes after extinction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jbi.13010

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Anderson J.R., 1976, A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data (Vol. 964)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Heintzman, P. D., Newsom, L., Bigelow, N. H., Wooller, M. J., Shapiro, B., & Williams, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Geography University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI 53706 USA
  • Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz Santa Cruz CA 95064 USA
  • Department of Anthropology The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA
  • Alaska Quaternary Center University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks AK 99775 USA
  • Alaska Stable Isotope Facility Water and Environmental Research Center Institute of Northern Engineering University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks AK 99775 USA
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1559-1571
ISSN
  • 0305-0270
  • 1365-2699
Cited by
28
References
57
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (PLR‐1203772, PLR‐1203997, PLR‐1204233, PLR‐1203990)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.