Cited by 35Experimental Learning in EngineeringOnline and Blended LearningScience Education and Pedagogy

Enhancing distance learning of science—Impacts of remote labs 2.0 on students' behavioural and cognitive engagement

Sung, Shannon H., Li, Chenglu, Huang, Xudong, Xie, Charles·2021·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Background With the increasing popularity of distance education, how to engage students in online inquiry‐based laboratories remains challenging for science teachers. Current remote labs mostly adopt a centralized model with limited flexibility left for teachers' just‐in‐time instruction based on students' real‐time science practices. Objectives The goal of this research is to investigate the impact of a non‐centralized remote lab on students' cognitive and behavioural engagement. Methods A mixed‐methods design was adopted. Participants were the high school students enrolled in two virtual chemistry classes. Remote labs 2.0, branded as Telelab, supports a non‐centralized model of remote inquiry that can enact more interactive hands‐on labs anywhere, anytime. Teleinquiry Instructional Model was used to guide the curriculum design. Students' clickstreams logs and instruction timestamps were analysed and visualized. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether engagement levels influence their conceptual learning. Behavioural engagement patterns were corroborated with survey responses. Results and Conclusions We found approximate synchronizations between student–teacher–lab interactions in the heatmap. The guided inquiry enabled by Telelab facilitates real‐time communications between instructors and students. Students' conceptual learning is found to be impacted by varying engagement levels. Students' behavioural engagement patterns can be visualized and fed to ins…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12600

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sung, S. H., Li, C., Huang, X., & Xie, C.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Future Intelligence (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Sung, Shannon H.
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1606-1621
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W3197754406
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (#2054079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
remote laboratory, distance education, science education, student engagement, behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, inquiry-based learning, teacher-student relationship, conceptual learning, telepresence, clickstream analysis, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review