Cited by 170Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review

DENEKE, THOMAS, JAIS, PIERRE, SCAGLIONE, MARCO, SCHMITT, RAINER, DI BIASE, LUIGI, CHRISTOPOULOS, GEORGIOS, SCHADE, ANJA, MÜGGE, ANDREAS +9 more·2015·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has identified a high incidence of cerebral ischemia in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (silent). Detection of cerebral ischemic events on MRI is based on acute hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. In the literature, the incidence is related to specifications of MRI and depends on the definition applied. In comparative studies, silent cerebral events (SCE, diffusion-weighted MRI [DWI] positive only) appear to be approximately 3 times more common compared to using a definition of silent cerebral lesions (SCL; without fluid attenuated inverse recovery sequence [FLAIR] positivity). Whereas the FLAIR sequence may turn positive within days after the ischemic event, SCE definition is highly sensitive for early phases of ischemic brain damage. SCE/SCL appear to represent cerebral ischemic infarcts and determine the "embolic fingerprint" of a specific ablation technology and strategy used. The optimum time point for detecting SCE is early after AF ablation (24-72 hours), whereas detection of SCL can only be performed within the first 2-7 days (due to delay of FLAIR positivity). Different technology-, procedure-, and patient-related parameters have been identified to play a role in the multifactorial genesis of SCE/SCL. In recent years, evidence has been gathered that there may be differences of SCE/SCL rates depending upon the ablation technology used, but small patient numbers and a large number of potential confounders hamper all studies. As major findings of recent studies, mode of periprocedural and intraprocedural anticoagulation has been identified as a major predictor for incidences of SCE/SCL. Whereas procedural characteristics related to higher SCE/SCL-rates may be modified, unchangeable patient-related factors should be taken into account for future individualized risk assessment. Novel ablation devices introduced into the market should be tested for their potential embolic fingerprint and refinements of ablation procedures to reduce their embolic potential should be prompted. The knowledge of "best practice" in terms of low SCE/SCL rates has prompted changes in work-flow, which have been implemented into ablation procedures using novel ablation devices. So far, no study has linked SCE/SCL to neuropsychological decline and the low number of AF-ablation-associated events needs to be weighted against the multitude of preexisting asymptomatic MRI-detected brain lesions related to the course of AF itself. Future studies are needed to evaluate if more white matter hyperintensities due to AF may be prevented by AF ablation (producing only a small number of SCE/SCL).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jce.12608

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DENEKE, T., JAIS, P., SCAGLIONE, M., SCHMITT, R., DI BIASE, L., CHRISTOPOULOS, G., SCHADE, A., MÜGGE, A., BANSMANN, M., NENTWICH, K., MÜLLER, P., KRUG, J., ROOS, M., HALBFASS, P., NATALE, A., GAITA, F., & HAINES, D.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University Hospital Bordeaux Bordeaux FRA
  • Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti (IT)
  • Rhön-Klinikum (DE)
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David's Medical Center Austin Texas USA
  • Heart Center Bad Neustadt Bad Neustadt Germany
  • Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Hospital Cologne‐Porz Germany
  • St David's Medical Center (US)
  • Division of Cardiology Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin Italy
  • Oakland University (US)
Corresponding author
DENEKE, THOMAS
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-11
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
455-463
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1950554745
Cited by
170
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
atrial fibrillation ablation, cerebral embolism, diffusion-weighted imaging, FLAIR, anticoagulation, white matter hyperintensities, stroke risk, ablation devices, risk assessment, neuropsychological decline, asymptomatic brain lesions, atrial fibrillation
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Brain Ischemia, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Intracranial Embolism, Consensus, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review