Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incorporating microglia‐like cells in human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived retinal organoids

Chichagova, Valeria, Georgiou, Maria, Carter, Madeleine, Dorgau, Birthe, Hilgen, Gerrit, Collin, Joseph, Queen, Rachel, Chung, Git, Ajeian, Jila, Moya‐Molina, Marina, Kustermann, Stefan, Pognan, Francois, Hewitt, Philip, Schmitt, Michael, Sernagor, Evelyne, Armstrong, Lyle, Lako, Majlinda·2023·Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Microglia are the primary resident immune cells in the retina. They regulate neuronal survival and synaptic pruning making them essential for normal development. Following injury, they mediate adaptive responses and under pathological conditions they can trigger neurodegeneration exacerbating the effect of a disease. Retinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are increasingly being used for a range of applications, including disease modelling, development of new therapies and in the study of retinogenesis. Despite many similarities to the retinas developed in vivo, they lack some key physiological features, including immune cells. We engineered an hiPSC co‐culture system containing retinal organoids and microglia‐like (iMG) cells and tested their retinal invasion capacity and function. We incorporated iMG into retinal organoids at 13 weeks and tested their effect on function and development at 15 and 22 weeks of differentiation. Our key findings showed that iMG cells were able to respond to endotoxin challenge in monocultures and when co‐cultured with the organoids. We show that retinal organoids developed normally and retained their ability to generate spiking activity in response to light. Thus, this new co‐culture immunocompetent in vitro retinal model provides a platform with greater relevance to the in vivo human retina.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcmm.17670

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HNOs that incorporate microglia promote maturation and provide unique advantages as in vitro neuroimmune models.

    “Despite the limitations of organoid-based models, HNOs that incorporate microglia promote maturation97 and provide unique advantages as in vitro neuroimmune models98–103, which are increasingly becoming utilized.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1126/science.1194637 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/cne.903630106 · DOI
  3. 10.1242/dev.169474 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000365 · DOI
  5. 10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034425 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.03.139 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0135238 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3441-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2337/db16-0051 · DOI
  10. 10.15252/emmm.201505298 · DOI
  11. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01930 · DOI
  12. 10.1167/iovs.17-21672 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.05.007 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1903125117 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-018-06448-y · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00128 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.09.010 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/stem.2883 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.007 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41467-018-06684-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.023 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41419-017-0141-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.028 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/srep42330 · DOI
  25. 10.3389/fninf.2015.00028 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00803 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_42 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.scr.2020.102046 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41598-019-47444-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/stem.1667 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/stem.2963 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.02.003 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.021 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/stem.3365 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41467-019-12330-2 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.scr.2017.08.018 · DOI
  38. Lemaitre C, 2001, The effects of intraocular injection of interleukin‐13 on endotoxin‐induced uveitis in rats, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 42, 2022
  39. 10.1136/bjo.82.10.1195 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100915 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1820387116 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.65 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chichagova, V., Georgiou, M., Carter, M., Dorgau, B., Hilgen, G., Collin, J., Queen, R., Chung, G., Ajeian, J., Moya‐Molina, M., Kustermann, S., Pognan, F., Hewitt, P., Schmitt, M., Sernagor, E., Armstrong, L., & Lako, M.
Affiliations
  • Newcells Biotech Newcastle upon Tyne UK
  • Biosciences Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
  • F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland
  • Novartis Basel Switzerland
  • Merck Healthcare KGaA Darmstadt Germany
Venue
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-16
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
435-445
ISSN
  • 1582-1838
  • 1582-4934
Cited by
37
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T004460/1)
  • Medical Research Council Canada (MR/S035826/1)
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/CO16206/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review