Cited by 59Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Commentary: The construct validity of ‘camouflaging’ in autism: psychometric considerations and recommendations for future research ‐ reflection on Lai et al. (2020)

Open access
Williams, Zachary J.·2022·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Research on the construct of ‘camouflaging’ in autism and its sociodemographic/clinical correlates has far outpaced the work being done to establish the construct validity of camouflaging and its distinction from other similar constructs. The imprecision with which camouflaging is defined and measured has serious implications for future research on this topic, and unless additional effort is made to produce reliable and valid measurements of this construct, researchers will not be able to meaningfully assess important questions such as whether the effort of camouflaging one's behavior contributes to increased mental health difficulties. By reviewing the psychometric strengths and weaknesses of various operationalizations of camouflaging, this commentary highlights a pressing need for further measure validation in this area. Specific methodological guidance is provided for researchers interested in rigorously testing the validity of putative camouflaging measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13468

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pursuit of these objectives has been cross-sectionally associated with poor mental health, reduced wellbeing, and suicidality, although causal relationships have yet to be demonstrated.

    “In some cases, pursuit of these objectives has been cross-sectionally associated with poor mental health, reduced wellbeing, and suicidality (Cassidy et al., 2018; Hull et al., 2019, 2021), although causal relationships have yet to be demonstrated (Williams, 2021).”
  • Discussions about the validity and conceptual clarity of the so-called female autism phenotype, camouflaging and the female protective effect are ongoing.

    “Discussions about the validity and conceptual clarity of the so-called female (autism) phenotype106,309,310, camouflaging109,311–315 and female protective effect226,316 are ongoing.”

    From Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions (2023) · cites this paper as [315]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, Z. J.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Zachary J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-17
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
118-121
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W3171113476
Cited by
59
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32‐GM007347)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F30‐DC019510)
  • Vanderbilt University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
camouflaging, autism spectrum disorder, construct validity, psychometric validation, mental illness
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Humans, Mental Health, Psychometrics, Research Design, Research Personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review