A broader phenotype of autism: the clinical spectrum in twins.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shared environmental factors made only a small contribution to ASD risk overall, as in most other studies.
“Like most studies, 8,11 overall shared environmental factors contributed minimally to the risk of ASD.”
From Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Reported shared-environment contributions to ASD vary from 7% to 35%, although several studies find zero.
“Estimates of the contribution of shared environment range from 7% to 35%, 8 but multiple studies estimate the contribution to be zero.4,9,11,12”
From Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort
Bai, D., Yip, B. H. K., Windham, G. C., Sourander, A., Francis, R., Yoffe, R., Glasson, E., Mahjani, B., Suominen, A., Leonard, H., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1411 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Cretenoud, A. F., Grzeczkowski, L., Kunchulia, M., & Herzog, M. H. (2021) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.21.5.26 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Couteur, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W4230611253
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review