Cited by 25Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association between visceral adiposity index and risk of prediabetes: A meta‐analysis of observational studies

Open access
Wang, Dan, Fang, Rui, Han, Haicheng, Zhang, Jidong, Chen, Kaifei, Fu, Xiaoqing, He, Qinghu, Yang, Yong·2022·Journal of Diabetes Investigation

Abstract

Background and Objective: Epidemiological studies suggested that the association between the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and the risk of prediabetes is inconsistent. Whether VAI is a useful predictor of prediabetes remains unclear. Up until April 2021, there had been no systematic review on this topic. In this meta‐analysis, the available observational epidemiological evidence was synthesized to identify the association between VAI and prediabetes risk. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in any language were searched systematically from the earliest available online indexing year to April 2021 for relevant observational studies published on the association between VAI and the risk of prediabetes. A random effects model was used to combine quantitatively the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Ten relevant studies (2 cohort study, 2 case‐control studies, and 6 cross‐sectional studies) involving 112,603 participants were identified. Compared with the highest VAI, the lowest level of VAI was associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. The pooled OR of VAI for prediabetes was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.44–1.96), with significant heterogeneity across the included studies (P = 0.000, I2 = 91.4%). Exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the combined risk estimate. Conclusions: Integrated epidemiological evidence supports the hypothesis that VAI is a lipid combined anthropometric index and may be a risk factor for prediabetes. VAI may be related to a high risk of prediabetes. However, it should be noted that the included studies have a publication bias and there was significant heterogeneity between our pooled estimate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdi.13685

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Systematic review flow chart.
Figure 1 Systematic review flow chart.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Association between VAI and the risk of prediabetes in a meta‐analysis of observational studies.
Figure 2 Association between VAI and the risk of prediabetes in a meta‐analysis of observational studies.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Funnel plot with 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3 Funnel plot with 95% confidence interval.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1177/1559827615619159 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02068.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2337/dc06-1392 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.2017.7596 · DOI
  5. 10.1001/jama.2013.168118 · DOI
  6. Huang Y, 2016, Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta‐analysis, BMJ, 355, 15953
  7. 10.2215/CJN.07891109 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1008862 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03727.x · DOI
  11. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000485 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41591-019-0563-7 · DOI
  13. 10.2337/dc09-1825 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.5551/jat.12.295 · DOI
  15. 10.2337/dc09-0412 · DOI
  16. 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1805 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02378-0 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  19. RostomA DubéC CranneyA et al.Celiac Disease.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Rockville MD. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments No. 104.) Appendix D. Quality Assessment Forms. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK35156/Accessed September 2004.
  20. 10.1186/s12967-016-1020-8 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/dmrr.2615 · DOI
  22. 10.1055/s-0043-120440 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107798 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/nu11112654 · DOI
  25. 10.1159/000446121 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.019 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/dmrr.3424 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.045 · DOI
  29. 10.1089/met.2019.0078 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ijo.2013.181 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114112 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/eci.12030 · DOI
  33. 10.1001/2012.jama.11132 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.02.008 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41598-017-14251-w · DOI
  36. Kumpatla S, 2011, (2011) Visceral Adiposity Index and pattern of dyslipidaemia at different stages of glucose intolerance‐a study from India, Diabetes Met Syndr, 5, 17
  37. 10.1038/s41598-021-82053-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1259/bjr.20170808 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/s12933-018-0721-0 · DOI
  41. 10.3390/nu12072064 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/dom.13513 · DOI
  43. 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e7 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.018 · DOI
  45. 10.3390/ijms18102145 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s11695-010-0103-5 · DOI
  47. 10.1210/jc.2012-1518 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Fang, R., Han, H., Zhang, J., Chen, K., Fu, X., He, Q., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
  • Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN)
  • Hunan University of Medicine (CN)
  • Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yong
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
543-551
ISSN
  • 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-1124
OpenAlex
W3203879450
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China
  • Hangzhou Normal University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Keywords
visceral adiposity index, prediabetes, visceral fat, abdominal obesity, anthropometric index, diabetes risk factors
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Prediabetic State, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Adiposity, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review