Cited by 21Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Effects of switching from liraglutide to semaglutide or dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Iijima, Takahiro, Shibuya, Makoto, Ito, Yuzuru, Terauchi, Yasuo·2023·Journal of Diabetes Investigation

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have examined the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist switching, particularly in Japanese patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of switching from liraglutide to semaglutide or dulaglutide on blood glucose, body weight, and the occurrence of adverse effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was an open‐label, prospective, randomized, parallel‐group controlled trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide (0.6 or 0.9 mg) at Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital in Japan were recruited from September 2020 to March 2022 and, after obtaining informed consent, randomly assigned to the semaglutide or dulaglutide group (1:1). Changes in the glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 26 were evaluated post‐treatment. Results: Initially, 32 participants were enrolled, of whom 30 completed the study. Glycemic control was significantly better in the semaglutide group than in the dulaglutide group (−0.42 ± 0.49% vs −0.00 ± 0.34%, P = 0.0120). Body weight significantly decreased in the semaglutide group (−2.6 ± 3.6 kg, P = 0.0153), whereas no change was observed in the dulaglutide group (−0.1 ± 2.7 kg, P = 0.8432). We found a significant difference in body weight between the groups ( P = 0.0469). The proportion of participants who reported adverse events was 75.0% and 18.8% in the semaglutide and dulaglutide groups, respectively. One patient in the semaglutide group had difficulty continuing treatment due to severe vomiting and weight loss. Conclusions: Switching from once‐daily liraglutide to once‐weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg significantly improved glycemic control and body weight compared with switching to once‐weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdi.14000

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Trujillo JM, Nuffer W, Ellis SL. GLP‐1 receptor agonists: a review of head‐to‐head clinical studies. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2015; 6: 19– 28. 25678953 PMC4321870
  2. [3]Burcelin R, Gourdy P. Harnessing glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists for the pharmacological treatment of overweight and obesity. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 86– 98. 27636208
  3. [6]Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double‐blind, randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 121– 130. 31189511
  4. [7]American Diabetes Association. Introduction: standards of medical care in Diabetes‐2022. Diabetes Care 2022; 45: S1– S2. 34964812
  5. [8]Araki E, Goto A, Kondo T, et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019. Diabetol Int 2020; 11: 165– 223. 32802702 PMC7387396
  6. [9]Ishii H, Bradley C, Riazi A, et al. The Japanese version of the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ): Translation and clinical evaluation. J Clin Exp Med 2000; 192: 809– 814 [in Japanese].
  7. [10]Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open‐label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 275– 286. 29397376
  8. [11]Miyagawa J, Odawara M, Takamura T, et al. Once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide is non‐inferior to once‐daily liraglutide and superior to placebo in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26‐week randomized phase III study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 974– 983. 26179187 PMC5042083
  9. [12]Wilding JP, Overgaard RV, Jacobsen LV, et al. Exposure‐response analyses of liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016; 18: 491– 499. 26833744 PMC5069568
  10. [13]O'Neil PM, Birkenfeld AL, McGowan B, et al. Efficacy and safety of semaglutide compared with liraglutide and placebo for weight loss in patients with obesity: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo and active controlled, dose‐ranging, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2018; 392: 637– 649. 30122305
  11. [14]le Roux CW, Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. 3 years of liraglutide versus placebo for type 2 diabetes risk reduction and weight management in individuals with prediabetes: a randomised, double‐blind trial. Lancet 2017; 389: 1399– 1409. 28237263
  12. [15]Ito D, Iuchi T, Kurihara S, et al. Efficacy and clinical characteristics of liraglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Med Res 2015; 7: 694– 699. 26251684 PMC4522987
  13. [16]Seino Y, Terauchi Y, Osonoi T, et al. Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20: 378– 388. 28786547 PMC5813234
  14. [17]Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, et al. Safety and efficacy of once‐weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20: 1202– 1212. 29322610 PMC5969242
  15. [19]Gabery S, Salinas CG, Paulsen SJ, et al. Semaglutide lowers body weight in rodents via distributed neural pathways. JCI Insight 2020; 5: e133429. 32213703 PMC7213778
  16. [21]Terauchi Y, Satoi Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Monotherapy with the once weekly GLP‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: dose‐dependent effects on glycaemic control in a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Endocr J 2014; 61: 949– 959. 25029955
  17. [22]Takase T, Nakamura A, Yamamoto C, et al. Improvement in treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide to dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Investig 2019; 10: 699– 705. PMC6497607 30076787
  18. [23]Bloomgarden ZT, Dodis R, Viscoli CM, et al. Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose‐lowering efficacy: a meta‐regression analysis. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2137– 2139. 16936168
  19. [24]DeFronzo RA, Stonehouse AH, Han J, et al. Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose‐lowering therapies: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 309– 317. 20536494
  20. [25]Giugliano D, Maiorino M, Bellastella G, et al. Relationship of baseline HbA1c, HbA1c change and HbA1c target of <7% with insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65: 602– 612. 21489084
  21. [26]Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Ohashi Y, et al. Effect of rapid glycemic control on progression of diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1992; 36: 356– 367. 1464975
  22. [27]Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 874– 886. 9682700

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iijima, T., Shibuya, M., Ito, Y., & Terauchi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital (JP)
  • Yuzuru Clinic Saitama Japan
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Terauchi, Yasuo
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-05
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
774-781
ISSN
  • 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-1124
OpenAlex
W4323255451
Cited by
21
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Japan
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation
  • Ono Pharmaceutical
  • Novartis Pharma
  • Pfizer Japan
  • MSD K.K.
  • Eli Lilly Japan
  • Bayer Yakuhin
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, drug switching, glycemic control, HbA1c, body weight, adverse events, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Prospective Studies, Recombinant Fusion Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review