The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long‐term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study
Open accessAbstract
Background Ongoing evaluation of biological agents in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis is needed to support their long‐term use. Objective To evaluate long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab through 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo or ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at Weeks 0, 4 and every‐12‐weeks thereafter; placebo patients crossed‐over to ustekinumab at Week 12. Clinical response through Week 244 was evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in the Overall Population (i.e. patients receiving ≥1 dose of ustekinumab), Initial Responders (i.e. PASI 75 responders [Weeks 28/40] re‐randomized at Week 40 to continue every‐12‐week maintenance) and Partial Responders (i.e. <PASI 75 responders adjusted to every‐8‐week maintenance at Weeks 28 or 40). Safety endpoints were evaluated through Week 264 for the Overall Population. Results Overall, 68.7% (517/753) of ustekinumab‐treated patients completed treatment through Week 244. Initial clinical responses were generally maintained through Week 244 (PASI 75: 63.4% and 72.0%; PASI 90: 39.7% and 49.0%; PASI 100: 21.6% and 26.4%) for patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg, respectively. Similarly, PASI 75 responses were generally maintained among Initial Responders [79.1% (45 mg) and 80.8% (90 mg)] and Partial Responders [57.6% (45 mg) and 55.1% (90 mg)]. With 3104 patient‐years of follow‐up, rates of overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, serious infections, malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events were generally consistent over time and comparable between doses. Conclusions Through 5 years of continuous treatment, ustekinumab demonstrated stable clinical response and a safety profile consistent with previous reports.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tyring, S., Gottlieb, A., Papp, K., Gordon, K., Leonardi, C., Wang, A., Lalla, D., Woolley, M., Jahreis, A., Zitnik, R., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67763-x · Cited by 1,069
Self-citation
Cited by
Teng, M. W. L., Bowman, E. P., McElwee, J. J., Smyth, M. J., Casanova, J.-L., Cooper, A. M., & Cua, D. J. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3895 · Cited by 873
Griffiths, C. E. M., Reich, K., Lebwohl, M., van de Kerkhof, P., Paul, C., Menter, A., Cameron, G. S., Erickson, J., Zhang, L., Secrest, R. J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60125-8 · Cited by 834
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimball, A. B., Papp, K. A., Wasfi, Y., Chan, D., Bissonnette, R., Sofen, H., Yeilding, N., Li, S., Szapary, P., Gordon, K. B., & on behalf of the PHOENIX 1 investigators
- Venue
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1535-1545
- ISSN
- 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3083
- OpenAlex
- W2129777700
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jdv.12046
- The paper
- Kimball, A. B., Papp, K. A., Wasfi, Y., Chan, D., Bissonnette, R., Sofen, H., Yeilding, N., Li, S., Szapary, P., Gordon, K. B., & on behalf of the PHOENIX 1 investigators. (2013). Long‐term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.