Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cutaneous manifestations in COVID‐19: a first perspective

Recalcati, S.·2020·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

In December 2019, unexplained pneumonia cases were initially reported in Wuhan, China. The pathogen, a novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was isolated from lower respiratory tract samples of infected patients, and the resultant disease was termed as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).1 By February 15, COVID-19 has rapidly spread throughout China and across the world, until a pandemic condition was announced by March 11.2 Italy was one of the most involved country, and extraordinary restricted measures were performed. Nonetheless, many health workers were affected, and due to this condition, a strong effort was asked to every physicians and nurses. Dermatologists were involved in first line as well, especially in the triage stations and in the medical wards with positive cases, because of the lack of medical doctors. Suspect of COVID-19 is mainly made on clinical signs (fever, fatigue, dry cough, anorexia, dyspnoea, rhinorrhoea, ageusia, anosmia), on vital parameters (temperature, pulse oximetry saturation) and on radiological settings (X-ray, chest CT scan).3 Laboratory findings could often demonstrate lymphopenia and elevated LDH. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab, allowing the virus isolation, confirm the diagnosis. There are no data in the literature so far about skin manifestations in COVID-19. As dermatologists, we tried to analyse the cutaneous involvement in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the Lecco Hospital, Lombardy, Italy. We visited directly or indirectly (because of the high risk of contagion and the lack of protective masks) 148 positive patients and we tried, where it was possible, to record medical history. No clinical images were performed because of the high risk to infect other patients, introducing a photographic device in a restricted room. Analysing history of recent drug intake, we excluded 60 patients that had used any new medicine in the 15 previous days. From the collected data (88 patients), 18 patients (20.4%) developed cutaneous manifestations. Eight patients developed cutaneous involvement at the onset, 10 patients after the hospitalization. Cutaneous manifestations were erythematous rash (14 patients), widespread urticaria (three patients) and chickenpox-like vesicles (one patient). Trunk was the mainly involved region. Itching was low or absent and usually lesions healed in few days. Apparently, there was not any correlation with disease's severity. Analysing these data, we may speculate that skin manifestations are similar to cutaneous involvement occurring during common viral infections. This is a first report and a first perspective of SARS-CoV-2 cutaneous manifestations. Indisputably, we need more papers to confirm and better understand skin involvement in COVID-19. Additionally, both the awareness of protection and protective facilities, generally lacking in medical departments, are of primary necessity. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 may occur during an incubation period that may be as long as 14 days.4 Asymptomatic individuals (or individuals within the incubation period) has also been described as possible carriers; however, the extent to which this occurs remains unknown.5 Person-to-person spread is thought to occur mainly via respiratory droplets, resembling the spread of influenza. With droplet transmission, virus released in the respiratory secretions when a person with infection coughs, sneezes or talks can infect another person if it makes direct contact with the mucous membranes; infection can also occur if a person touches an infected surface and then touches his or her eyes, nose or mouth. Currently, we strongly underline that infection prevention and control are urgent and critical due to the lack of specific treatment and heightened risk of spreading during the incubation period.6

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.16387

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,348

Metadata

Authors
Recalcati, S.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
e212-e213
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W3013889157
Cited by
1,348
References
1
FWCI
205.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutaneous manifestations in COVID‐19: a first perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jdv.16387
The paper
Recalcati, S. (2020). Cutaneous manifestations in COVID‐19: a first perspective. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.