Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: systematic review

Open access
da Rosa Mesquita, Rodrigo, Francelino Silva Junior, Luiz Carlos, Santos Santana, Fernanda Mayara, Farias de Oliveira, Tatiana, Campos Alcântara, Rafaela, Monteiro Arnozo, Gabriel, Rodrigues da Silva Filho, Etvaldo, Galdino dos Santos, Aisla Graciele, Oliveira da Cunha, Euclides José, Salgueiro de Aquino, Saulo Henrique, Freire de Souza, Carlos Dornels·2021·Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

Abstract

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are varied in the general population. This study aimed to systematize the literature regarding clinical manifestations of patients with confirmed COVID-19. A systematic review of the literature was conducted. A total of 8070 scientific productions were found in the databases. Among the studies, 184 met the initial inclusion criteria, with a total of 114,046 patients. After complete reading, 32 studies that did not report clinical manifestations were excluded. The 152 publications finally included a total of 41,409 individuals from at least 23 countries and 26 different clinical manifestations were reported. In percentage terms, 6 symptoms had a general prevalence greater than or equal to 25%, namely, fever (58.66%), cough (54.52%), dyspnea (30.82%), malaise (29.75%), fatigue (28.16%) and sputum/secretion (25.33%). Neurological symptoms (20.82%), dermatological manifestations (20.45%), anorexia (20.26%), myalgia (16.9%), sneezing (14.71%), sore throat (14.41%), rhinitis (14.29%), goosebumps (13.49%), headache (12.17%), chest pain (11.49%) and diarrhea (9.59%) were other common symptoms. Only one study reported dermatological manifestations. The least frequent sign/symptom was hemoptysis (1.65%). In studies with more than 100 patients, the 3 main symptoms were fever (57.93%), cough (54.21%), and dyspnea (30.64%). Dermatological manifestations do not appear among the main symptoms. The identification of all clinical manifestations of COVID-19 is essential for an early diagnosis and the adoption of preventive measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00508-020-01760-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Metadata

Authors
da Rosa Mesquita, R., Francelino Silva Junior, L. C., Santos Santana, F. M., Farias de Oliveira, T., Campos Alcântara, R., Monteiro Arnozo, G., Rodrigues da Silva Filho, E., Galdino dos Santos, A. G., Oliveira da Cunha, E. J., Salgueiro de Aquino, S. H., & Freire de Souza, C. D.
Venue
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Published
2020-11-26
Volume
133
Issue
7-8
Pages
377-382
ISSN
  • 0043-5325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-7671
OpenAlex
W3109609475
Cited by
394
References
29
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00508-020-01760-4
The paper
da Rosa Mesquita, R., Francelino Silva Junior, L. C., Santos Santana, F. M., Farias de Oliveira, T., Campos Alcântara, R., Monteiro Arnozo, G., Rodrigues da Silva Filho, E., Galdino dos Santos, A. G., Oliveira da Cunha, E. J., Salgueiro de Aquino, S. H., & Freire de Souza, C. D. (2021). Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: systematic review. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01760-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.