Cited by 13Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsMedical Research and TreatmentsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Innovation of clinical trials in China: Commentary on the publication of “CONSORT extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas 2017: Recommendations, explanation, and elaboration”

Wu, Taixiang, Bian, Zhaoxiang, Shang, Hongcai, Li, Youping·2017·Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jebm.12268

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wu, T., Bian, Z., Shang, H., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Youping
Venue
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
155-162
ISSN
  • 1756-5383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-5391
OpenAlex
W2753801589
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medical Research and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
clinical trial reporting, Chinese herbal medicine formulas, CONSORT extension, reporting guidelines, traditional Chinese medicine, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
China, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Publishing, Quality Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review