Push‐pull strategy for integrated control of Bactrocera minax (Diptera, Tephritidae) based on olfaction and vision
Abstract
Chinese citrus fly Bactrocera minax is a major destructive pest of citrus fruits. The adult stage of B. minax is the critical life stage for control measures because all other life stages are hidden either in infested host fruit or in soil. Therefore, we established a push‐pull system for the control of adults B. minax. Three types of attractants were tested in two orchards. With these attractants, the percentage of infested fruits was reduced from 95.0% to 75.4% and from 89.6% to 72.4% for navel orange and satsuma mandarin, respectively. The in‐house developed food attractant displayed the best reduction compared to two commercial attractants. The food attractant traps (pull) combined with Xanthium sibiricum leaf extract as the repellent (push) hung on a copse at the edge of the orchard fields further reduced the fruit infestation rate from 75.5% to 7.6% in the navel orchards and from 100.0% to 5.6% in the satsuma orchards. When the green luring balls were added as a visual cue to the pull component, the percentage of infested fruits in the orchards was further reduced from 27.8% and 36.6% to 0.4% and 2.9%, respectively. In this five‐year study, B. minax was effectively controlled using behavioural manipulation of their response to olfactory and visual cues in a push‐pull control strategy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A precise blend can be engineered as part of a push-pull strategy to direct egg-laying away from cage materials and towards the trap.
“this means that a precise blend can be engineered as part of a push-pull strategy (Menger et al. 2015; Cui et al. 2022) to more precisely direct egg- laying both away from cage materials and towards the trap.”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Cui et al. 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lemke, N. B., & Puniamoorthy, N. (2026) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.70249 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…VOCs elicit stronger responses than individual components alone (Thomas et al. 2024), this means that a precise blend can be engineered as part of a push–pull strategy (Menger et al. 2015; Cui et al. 2022) to more precisely direct egg-laying both away from cage materials and towards the trap.”
- Authors
- Cui, Z., Si, P., Liu, L., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Li, X., Zhou, J., & Zhou, Q.
- Affiliations
- Hunan Normal University (CN)
- Guizhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Qiong
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-08-14
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1243-1251
- ISSN
- 0931-2048 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0418
- OpenAlex
- W4291302690
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Entomology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672094)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Keywords
- Bactrocera minax, push-pull strategy, repellents, visual cues, olfactory cues, fruit infestation, navel orange, Citrus unshiu, behavioural manipulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review