The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review
Abstract
Rationale, aims, and objectives: The 6‐minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a test of functional exercise capacity. Several studies have reported the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT; however, the findings of the studies have not been examined in the context of one another. In this review, we aimed to summarize available information on the MCID for the 6MWT performed by patients with pathology. Methods: Relevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), examination of article reference lists, and consultation with an expert. Inclusion necessitated that articles (1) be original, full length, and peer reviewed, (2) report an MCID for the 6MWT, and (3) focus on adults with medical issues. Articles were excluded if the MCID was determined by a procedure other than receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, 6MWT distance, and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9‐item (0‐ to 18‐point) instrument. Results: Six articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, diffuse parenchymal lung disease, and non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and adults with fear of falling. Mean baseline 6MWT distances ranged from 295 to 551 m. The MCIDs for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was at least 0.70 ranged from 14.0 to 30.5 m. Conclusions: Based on our findings, a change of 14.0 to 30.5 m may be clinically important across multiple patient groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A change of 14.0 to 30.5 meters is clinically important for 6MWT [35];”
From Pilot study of a telehealth perioperative physical activity intervention for older adults with cancer and their caregivers (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.
Perera, S., Mody, S. H., Woodman, R. C., & Studenski, S. A. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x · Cited by 2,513
Interpretation of quality of life changes
LYDICK, E. G., & Epstein, R. S. (1993) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00435226 · Cited by 531
Holland, A. E., Hill, C. J., Rasekaba, T., Lee, A., Naughton, M. T., & McDonald, C. F. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.017 · Cited by 487
du Bois, R. M., Weycker, D. A., Albera, C., Bradford, W. Z., Costabel, U., Kartashov, A. I., LANCASTER, L. H., Noble, P. W., Sahn, S. A., Szwarcberg, J., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201007-1179oc · Cited by 462
Bohannon, R. W., & Glenney, S. S. (2014) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12158 · Cited by 431
Self-citationThe minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference
Turner, D., Schünemann, H. J., Griffith, L. E., Beaton, D., Griffiths, A. M., Critch, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024 · Cited by 368
Wise, R. A., & Brown, C. D. (2005) · COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.1081/copd-200050527 · Cited by 320
Grémeaux, V., Troisgros, O., Benaïm, S., Hannequin, A., Laurent, Y., Casillas, J.-M., & Benaïm, C. (2011) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.023 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 716
Tzeng, H., Chang, C.-C., Chen, S.-J., Hueng, D., Chu, C., & Chiang, H. (2025) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.014 · Cited by 3
Hares, N. A., Sanders, J. P., Esliger, D., Thomas, J. J. C., Bourron, B., MacKinnon, H. J., & Madigan, C. D. (2025) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101083 · Cited by 6
“The pre-operative mean difference of 39.0 m in the 6MWT exceeds the upper MCID range of 30.5 m in patients with pathology, 99 thus suggesting that exercise before surgery improves the functional aerobic capacity of patients awaiting TKA and THA.”
InfluentialRocha, T. C., Germano, R. R., Giacomini, M. C. D., Pace, F. H. D. L., Laterza, M. C., & Martinêz, D. G. (2025) · Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100748 · Cited by 3
“41 Notably, no study selected for this review reported adverse events during resistance and aerobic physical training.”
Miyata, K., Asakura, T., Shinohara, T., & Usuda, S. (2020) · リハビリテーション医学 : 日本リハビリテーション医学会誌 · doi:10.2490/jjrmc.20032 · Cited by 3
Fairman, C. M., Owens, O. L., Kendall, K. L., Steele, J., Schumpp, A., Latella, C., Jones, M. T., Marcotte, L., Dawson, J. M., Peddle-McIntyre, C. M. J., et al. (2023) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01405-z · Cited by 3
Woods, C. B., O’Regan, A., Doyle, C. B., Hayes, G., Clifford, A. M., Donnelly, A., Gillespie, P., Glynn, L. G., Murphy, A. W., Sheikhi, A., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110 · Cited by 3
“The 6MWT is a valid measure of functional exercise capacity with stable and reproducible results (49).”
BackgroundMoya-Gallardo, E., Fajardo-Gutiérrez, J., Acevedo, K., Verdugo‐Paiva, F., Bravo-Jeria, R., Ortiz-Muñoz, L. E., Briceño, F. A. C., & Espinosa‐Ramírez, M. (2024) · BMJ Open Respiratory Research · doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002431 · Cited by 3
Functional Capacity Impairment in Long COVID After 17 Months of Severe Acute Disease
Borges, F. F. D. R., Braga, A. C. B., Viana, B. S., Valente, J., Ferreira, J. M. B. B., Sant'Anna, T. J. P., Goulart, C. D. L., Val, F., & Arêas, G. P. T. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22020276 · Cited by 3
“The sample calculation was performed accepting the minimum clinically significant difference of 30 m walked in pulmonary disease [28] and an effect size (ES) of 0.85 Cohen’s D value.”
InfluentialSu, T.-T., Barclay, R., Moineddin, R., & Salbach, N. M. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309933 · Cited by 3
“Outdoor walk group dose-response study who were in the high attendance tertile (16–20 sessions) showed a mean improvement of 37.3 meters in 6-minute walk test performance from baseline to 3 months, which exceeds the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 30.5 meters [49].”
InfluentialMultimodal Telerehabilitation in Post COVID-19 Condition Recovery: A Series of 12 Cases
Carpallo‐Porcar, B., Beamonte, E. D. C., Jiménez‐Sánchez, C., Córdova-Alegre, P., la Cruz, N. B., & Calvo, S. (2025) · Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos · doi:10.3390/reports8010035 · Cited by 3
Hartman, M., Dosbaba, F., Baťalík, L., Vlažná, D., Plutinský, M., Brat, K., Costa, R. C., Lima, A. S., Cahalin, L. P., & Formiga, M. F. (2025) · COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.1080/15412555.2025.2487473 · Cited by 3
“…the mean difference in 6MWT distance between the TIRE IFRL and MTL groups was not statistically significant, the average gain of 38.6 meters observed in the TIRE IFRL group exceeds various proposed values for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT in COPD patients [28].”
InfluentialBlaurock, M., Busch, C., & Wiese, M. L. (2025) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-025-01637-w · Cited by 3
Rubin, D. S., Hung, A., Yamamoto, E., Hedeker, D., Conroy, D. E., Huisingh-Scheetz, M. J., Brach, J. S., Glynn, N. W., & Danilovich, M. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323759 · Cited by 3
“A threshold of a change in 30-meters was chosen as this has been deemed a minimal clinically important distance (MCID) in multimorbid, frail older adults [36].”
Wang, H., Donovan, K. A., Rajasekhara, S., Padhya, T. A., Buck, H. G., Szalacha, L. A., Chang, J. M., Brown, J. D., & Smith, B. (2020) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.22099 · Cited by 3
Papavasiliou, K., Gkekas, N. K., Stamiris, D., Pantekidis, I., & Tsiridis, E. E. (2022) · European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology · doi:10.1007/s00590-022-03320-0 · Cited by 3
“It must be noted though that the six minutes’ walk test is an exercise test, used to evaluate aerobic capacity, performance and endurance [47].”
MethodHenson, G. J., Taylor, B. V., van der Mei, I. A. F., Claflin, S. B., Simpson, S., Palmer, A. J., Xia, Q., Antony, B., Singh, A., & Campbell, J. A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062703 · Cited by 3
Lock, M., Post, D., Dollman, J., & Parfitt, G. (2023) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.740 · Cited by 4
“60 As such, the 29-m increase in the current, relatively healthy population may not be clinically meaningful.”
BackgroundSchütz, F., Haffter, E., Meichtry, A., Winteler, B., & Gantschnig, B. E. (2023) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.57187/smw.2023.40083 · Cited by 3
Eyigör, S. (2024) · Ağrı - The Journal of The Turkish Society of Algology · doi:10.14744/agri.2022.37108 · Cited by 3
“[23]”
Cook, S. B., Chaudhry, B. A., Petersen, C. L., MacKenzie, T. A., & Batsis, J. A. (2024) · Advanced Biology · doi:10.1002/adbi.202400068 · Cited by 3
Ketcheson, L. R., Loetzner, F., Wentz, C. F., Miller, S., & Pitchford, E. A. (2024) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3231 · Cited by 4
“There are not widely accepted minimal clinically important differences for the 6MWT in adults, but average improvements from the parents do exceed those proposed for multiple patient populations, ranging from 14 to 30.5 m (Bohannon & Crouch, 2017).”
InfluentialBeyond the Clinic: Virtual Care as the Future of Long COVID Rehabilitation
Anderson, M., & Bauer, N. (2024) · Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal · doi:10.1097/cpt.0000000000000278 · Cited by 3
“55,56 For individuals who are appropriate for exertional testing, submaximal aerobic capacity tests such as the 6-Minute Walk Test 57,58 Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test, 59,60 or Buffalo Concussion Bike Test 59,61 may be used.”
Burgos-Bragado, J. M., la Cruz, N. B., Carpallo‐Porcar, B., Blas-Laína, J. L., Calvo, S., & Jiménez‐Sánchez, C. (2025) · Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos · doi:10.3390/reports8020060 · Cited by 3
“This test integrates the responses of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal systems, making it a reliable indicator of functional performance over time [29].”
Hilberdink, B., van der Giesen, F. J., Vlieland, T. P. M. V., van Bodegom‐Vos, L., & van Weely, S. F. E. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.1080/03009742.2021.1992845 · Cited by 3
“In addition, we calculated how many participants (numbers and percentage) did and did not improve on the ASPI [if at least one item improved by ≥ 20%, whereas none of the items worsened by ≥ 20%, it was classified as improved (38)] and how many improved, had no change, and worsened on the 6MWT over at least 30 m, its…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBertapelli, F., Johnson, M. J., Pitetti, K. H., Smith, M. C., Carlson, B., Curtis, J. S., & Agiovlasitis, S. (2021) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101173 · Cited by 3
Results of the Diaphragmatic Plication Database: 10 Years' Experience
Kosse, N. J., Galetin, T., Schwarz, S. B., Mathes, T., Koryllos, A., Lopez‐Pastorini, A., Beckers, F., & Stoelben, E. (2021) · The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735496 · Cited by 3
Rhodes, S., Waters, D. L., Brockway, B., & Skinner, M. (2022) · Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1071/hc22033 · Cited by 3
Badr, H. E.-S., Saunders, T. J., Carter, A., Castillo, L. R., Bayoumy, O., & Barrett, M. (2022) · Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders · doi:10.1089/met.2022.0056 · Cited by 3
“37 Not surprisingly, given the above changes, we observed a 28-percentage point reduction in the number of participants with > 3 components of the MetS at study completion, along with a 20-percentage point increase in the number with 3 criteria.”
Olivares, A., Paneroni, M., Comini, L., Zanelli, E., Corica, G., Genta, F. T., & Scalvini, S. (2024) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08648-9 · Cited by 2
“…program were calculated and compared to the Minimal clinically important difference (Mcid) for the 6MWt: 30.5 metres according to bohannon et al. 8 two subgroups of patients were identified: with Δ6MWT ≥30.5 metres (Improvers, IM) and <30.5 metres (not iM). icf data were collected in 2019…”
InfluentialWalking speed and distance requirements for functional community ambulation in Singapore
Lee, C. J. W., Lim, C. J. Y., Das, A. K., Quah, A. S. K., & Wee, S. K. (2025) · Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal · doi:10.1142/s1013702525500088 · Cited by 2
Turan, H., Yasacı, Z., & Elkan, H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13151883 · Cited by 2
“These tests have been applied in diverse populations, including older adults and individuals with cardiovascular or orthopedic conditions [8,18,19], but have not yet been directly compared as substitutes for the 6MWT in bariatric surgery candidates.”
Minimal Important Change in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A Systematic Review
Yuine, H., Sasaki, T., Miyata, K., Saito, S., & Shiraishi, H. (2025) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492251360232 · Cited by 2
“…for calculating MIC and MDC have been reported; moreover, the importance of assessing bias risk and client condition before using MIC and MDC as a reference can be inferred from the results of several MIC and MDC review studies (Bohannon & Crouch, 2017; Bohannon & Glenney, 2014; Low & Walsh, 2022).”
Effects of Nordic Walking in people with respiratory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vilanova-Pereira, M., Barral-Fernández, M., Labata‐Lezaun, N., Llurda-Almuzara, L., Pérez‐Bellmunt, A., Jácome, C. I. O., & Lista-Paz, A. (2025) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/jrm.v57.43090 · Cited by 2
“A previous systematic review by Bohannon et al. (60) established the MCID range as 14 to 30.5 m for various respiratory patient groups.”
InfluentialLima, J. L., Inácio, P. A., Filho, A. S. S., Paes, F., Ferreira-Garcia, R., Gonçalves, L. L., Aprigliano, V., Carta, M. G., Budde, H., Nardi, A. E., et al. (2025) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2025.2559180 · Cited by 2
“Additionally, the systematic review of Bohannon et al. [53] shows that the magnitude of gains in the 6MWT test between 14.5 and 30.5 m is clinically relevant in patients with motor deficits, which can be observed in the study [38].”
InfluentialKleve, G., Santa, C. D., Kristiansen, F. I. S., Tegnander, M., Buch, V., Hagemann, C. S., Helgheim, M., Engene, P., Pesonen, H., Kleveland, M. K., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1609678 · Cited by 2
Stonkuvienė, V., Kubilius, R., & Lendraitienė, E. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61101812 · Cited by 4
“It has been reported that a minimal clinically important difference for change in the 6MWD ranges from 14 to 30.5 m in the population of patients with cardiovascular diseases [40].”
InfluentialEichel, V. M., Oomen-Welke, K., Störk, M., Huber, R., Storz, M. A., & Naumann, J. (2025) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103279 · Cited by 2
“We expected a clinically relevant difference of 15 % of the mean and a SD of 20 % of the mean in the 6MRT test between the WBE and the CLG, as this is seen as a clinically important difference and a typical SD in the 6-min-run-test (Bohannon and Crouch, 2017).”
Herrin, K. R., Kestur, S., Zhou, S., O’Sullivan, G., Snow, T., Childers, W. L., & Young, A. J. (2025) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.70028 · Cited by 2
“29 The ST asymmetry index was calculated as follows 26 : STasymmetry index A value equal to zero indicates perfect symmetry.”
Hou, C. Q., Luo, X., Xu, Q. S., Zhi, M., Liu, M., Deng, S. Y., Wang, S. S., & Hu, H. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1655597 · Cited by 2
Jiang, B., Lu, S., Yan, Y., Wang, R., Xu, M., Huang, L., & Shen, Y. (2025) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-025-04418-5 · Cited by 2
“We anticipated a between-group difference of 30 m in the 6MWT, which represents the minimal clinically important difference according to previous studies [8].”
Home-Based Exercise Improves Muscle Oxidative Capacity in Kidney Disease
Begue, G., Ahmadi, A., Hayden, C., Foster, A., Rehman, U. N., Norman, J., Vargas, C. R., Bennett, B. J., McDonald, C. M., Ikizler, T. A., et al. (2025) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2025.103737 · Cited by 4
“The observed improvement in k PCr with exercise coincided with clinically relevant gains in mobility endurance and muscle endurance with a 39 m difference in the 6MWD 39 and a significant increase in total work output on cycle ergometry in EX versus UC.”
Romero-Elias, M., García-González, D., Bosque, I. E., Blázquez, V. S., Vielba, E., Méndez-Otero, M., Rabanal, A. P., Soriano, M. C., & Ruiz-Casado, A. I. (2025) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000003931 · Cited by 3
Sun, Y., Mao, W., Li, Y., Sun, Y., Li, K., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., Bai, H., Xia, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1673338 · Cited by 3
Ntoukas, S. M., Mohamad, N., Boparai, R., Dennett, L., McNeely, M. L., Prado, C. M. M., & Courneya, K. S. (2026) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.107902 · Cited by 2
Boukadida, R., Saadaoui, M., Thabet, N., mahfoudh, O., Asma, F., Nouir, S., SAHTOUT, W., Aicha, N. B., Azzabi, A., Guedri, Y., et al. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0337910 · Cited by 2
“A systematic review published by Bohannon and Crouch, 2017 [39] identified an MCID range of 14.0 to 30.5 meters across various patient populations, with different pathologies but no specific data were found for CKD patients.”
InfluentialAlexander, H. B., O’Connell, N., Clary, H. M. M., Burgos‐Aguilar, C., Peters, C., Brubaker, P. H., Fountain, N. B., Shaltout, H. A., & Fanning, J. T. (2026) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2026.111051 · Cited by 2
Etayo-Urtasun, P., de Asteasu, M. L. S., & Izquierdo, M. (2026) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-026-02469-6 · Cited by 2
“…TUG (~ 0.8–1.4 s), gait speed (0.05 m·s ⁻ 1 small; 0.10 m·s ⁻ 1 substantial), VO 2 peak (~ 3.5 mL·kg ⁻ 1 ·min ⁻ 1 ≈ 1 MET), handgrip (~ 5–6% in older adults), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, ≈3–5 points per domain), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, ≥ 0.3–0.5% absolute reduction) [65–71].”
InfluentialAndersen, L. K., Witting, N., & Vissing, J. (2021) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2021.1876760 · Cited by 2
Belluscio, V., Bustos, A. S. O., Camomilla, V., Rizzo, F., Sciarra, T., Gabbianelli, M., Guerriero, R., Morsilli, O., Martelli, F., & Giacomozzi, C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254878 · Cited by 2
“� The core of the instrumental functional assessment is the performance of an adapted version of the six minutes walking test (6MWT) [55]: the participant will be asked to walk on a passive treadmill, at 0 slope, “as fast as possible without running and trying to maintain the same pace during the test”.”
Verburg, A. C., van Dulmen, S. A., Kiers, H., der Sanden, M. W. G. N., & van der Wees, P. J. (2022) · ERJ Open Research · doi:10.1183/23120541.00008-2022 · Cited by 2
“§ For the multilevel analysis of the 6MWT, we used an MCID of ± ⩾ 30 m [33]. ƒ For the multilevel analysis of the CCQ, we used an MCID of ± ⩾ 0.4 points [34].”
InfluentialReliability of Fitness Assessments in Children With Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties
Almarjawi, A., Wright, K. E., Buist, B. D., Cairney, J., Ton, T. T., & Furzer, B. J. (2023) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.2022-0058 · Cited by 2
Brennan, T. H., Lewis, L. K., Gordon, S. J., & Prichard, I. J. (2023) · Journal of Population Ageing · doi:10.1007/s12062-023-09438-1 · Cited by 2
“However, in total distance walked, the mean difference in 6MWT was 42.9 m, surpassing previously reported minimal clinically important differences (Bohannon & Crouch, 2017; Kwok et al., 2013).”
InfluentialAnderson, L. J., Paulsen, L., Miranda, G., Syrjala, K. L., Graf, S. A., Chauncey, T. R., & Garcia, J. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302970 · Cited by 2
Yang, Y., Jin, Y., Chen, C., Zheng, Q., Ge, M., Wang, L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd-24-753 · Cited by 2
“It is worth noting that the baseline 6MWD in previous studies ranged from 295 to 551 m (29), which is nearly two times higher than what we found in the current study (148.0 m in the intervention group and 146.6 m in the control group).”
InfluentialAlbrecht, T., Pastva, A. M., Yang, Q. Z., Lee, Y., LeBlanc, T. W., Richardson, D. R., & Bryant, A. L. (2024) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000001408 · Cited by 2
Mura, M., Rivoire, É., Dehina-Khenniche, L., Jazzar, G., Schlatter, S., Della-Schiava, N., Arsicot, M., Fayad, Z. A., Lermusiaux, P., Long, A., et al. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103158 · Cited by 2
“30 These results support the ef fi cacy of moderate-intensity physical activity intervention in such patients, and more generally, the bene fi cial effects of physical activity on atherosclerosis 12 and its risk factors, 31 especially in patients with asymptomatic carotid plaque.”
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. D., Regalado-Cabello, P., Rodríguez-Montes, M., Martos, I. C., Núñez, J. M., & Valenza, M. C. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15095054 · Cited by 2
Barker, K. L., Newman, M., Knight, R., Hannink, E., Hughes, T., Barreto, C., & Room, J. (2025) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-025-07582-2 · Cited by 2
“…m was statistically significant and within the 14.0 to 30.5 m range cited as a clinically meaningful across relevant patient groups such as those with fear of falling and respiratory disease, and above the estimate of 19–22 m for a small meaningful change for older adults in the community [30, 31].”
InfluentialDelgado, B., Lopes, I., Mendes, E., Preto, L. S. R., Gomes, B. P., & Novo, A. (2019) · Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Reabilitação · doi:10.33194/rper.2019.v1.n2.02.4583 · Cited by 2
Kim, Y. J., Crane, P. B., Houmard, J. A., Swift, D. L., & Wu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/hcr.0000000000000586 · Cited by 2
Dutra, L. R. D. V., Silva‐Filho, E., Oliveira, M., Tavares, B. N. P., Pegado, R., & Micussi, M. T. A. B. C. (2021) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.038 · Cited by 2
Functional intermuscular reduction in spasticity for people with multiple sclerosis
Miller, B., Kolobe, T. H. A., Larson, R. D., Pribble, B. A., Pardo, G., & James, S. A. (2022) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical · doi:10.1177/20552173211061547 · Cited by 2
“While the MCID on the 6MWT for people with MS has not been reported, across multiple ages and different pathologies studied, changes of 15–35 meters are considered minimally clinically important.(21) In our study, 75% of participants exceeded a change of 14 meters and the entire lower functioning group exceeded 32 met…”
BackgroundImpacto de la rehabilitación pulmonar en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar restrictiva
Betancourt-Peña, J., Rivera, J. A., Mejía, L. M. O., Castillo, N. T.-D., & Benadives-Córdoba, V. (2022) · Fisioterapia · doi:10.1016/j.ft.2022.01.001 · Cited by 2
Allado, E., Poussel, M., Albuisson, É., Paysant, J., Temperelli, M., Hily, O., Moussu, A., Benhajji, N., Gauchard, G. C., & Chenuel, B. J. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10050758 · Cited by 2
“5 m may be clinically significant across multiple patient groups) [12].”
BackgroundLarson, C. A., Roth, E. A., Mahon, A. J. S., Crinion, M., Fischer, K., Yim, S. H., & Smith, A. K. (2023) · Journal of Aging and Physical Activity · doi:10.1123/japa.2021-0516 · Cited by 2
Patel, N. P., Sartanpara, D., & Savaliya, J. (2023) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Research · doi:10.52403/ijhsr.20230504 · Cited by 3
THE EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL EXERCISE CAPACITY OF PATIENTS AFTER CARDIAC SURGERIES
Łuczak, J., & Rudenko, L. A. (2023) · Acta Balneologica · doi:10.36740/abal202303103 · Cited by 2
Qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde na síndrome Pós-Covid-19
Castro, C. L. F. E., de Deus, F. Â., Cardoso, R. F., Xavier, D. M., & Lima, V. P. (2023) · ASSOBRAFIR Ciência · doi:10.47066/2177-9333.ac.2022.0060 · Cited by 2
Urban Environment and Human Health: Motivations for Urban Regeneration to Adapt
Cremonini, L., Carotenuto, F., Famulari, D., Fiorillo, E., Nardino, M., Neri, L., & Georgiadis, T. (2023) · doi:10.3390/ecas2023-16350 · Cited by 2
Clinically Important Differences for Mobility Measures Derived from the Testosterone Trials
Stephens‐Shields, A. J., Farrar, J. T., Ellenberg, S. S., Storer, T. W., Gill, T. M., Basaria, S. S., Pahor, M., Cauley, J. A., Ensrud, K. E., Preston, P. E., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16942 · Cited by 2
“5 m).(29) The CID estimates of PF10 are similar to the expert opinion at the time of TTrials’ planning.”
Arkesteijn, M., & Low, D. C. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.06.06.22276029 · Cited by 2
van Hoek, J. P. K. D., van Riet, R. C., Khorami, A. K., & Chiarotto, A. (2022) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glac155 · Cited by 2
Inspiratory Muscle Training for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients.
Polastri, M., Pehlivan, E., & Reed, R. M. (2024) · Experimental and Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.6002/ect.2024.0073 · Cited by 2
Kudiersky, N., Rosenthal, K., Frith, G., Phillips, G., Keen, C., Barratt, S., Greenfield, D., MILLS, G. H., Myers, A., Copeland, R. J., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.20.25334050 · Cited by 2
Sarinukul, C., Donpunha, W., Nakmareong, S., Sawanyawisuth, K., Ruksapukdee, W., & Janyacharoen, T. (2021) · The Philippine journal of science · doi:10.56899/150.6b.08 · Cited by 1
Leach, H. J., Fairman, C. M., Gomes, E. L., & Marker, R. J. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07814-3 · Cited by 1
“The MCID for 6MWT was an increase of ≥ 30 m from pre- to post-program [6].”
BackgroundMethodReduced Functioning After Hospitalization for COVID-19 Infection
Smith, J. M., Smith, E. M. T., Zafron, M. L., Bohannon, R. W., MILLER, K. L., Thiele, A. K., Zeleznik, H., & Ohtake, P. J. (2024) · Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/jat.0000000000000239 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFebbi, M., Vandoni, M., Patanè, P., Ballarin, S., Pellino, V. C., Gatti, A., Caldarella, E., de Caro, F., & Marin, L. (2024) · Mechanisms and machine science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63755-1_11 · Cited by 1
Goh, R. W. Y., Chan, G. J. Y., Hanip, L. A. M., & Kwok, B. C. (2024) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.13304 · Cited by 1
Lee, J. S., Ahn, J. H., Lee, J. W., & Baek, C. Y. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13206213 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, meaningful improvements were observed in the SPPB, BBS, TUG, and 6WMT with an MCID score ≥ 1, an MDC score ≥ 5.9, an MDC ≥ 2.68 s, and an MCID ≥ 30.5 m, respectively [37–40].”
MethodInfluentialChan, H. S. J., Tang, A., Li, O., Orprecio, A. J., Abrams, S. W., Wiley, E., MacDonald, K., Ma, J., & Namasivayam-MacDonald, A. M. (2024) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00137 · Cited by 1
Selves, C., Dehem, S., Lejeune, T. M., Deltombe, T., & Stoquart, G. G. (2024) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.1177/10538135241303343 · Cited by 1
“However, caution is needed in interpreting Hara et al. ’ s results due to their retrospective methodology.”
Pearson, L. T., Pönitzová, A., Stelling, M., Duffy, D., Keenan, A., Behm, D. G., Stuart, S., Goodall, S., & Barry, G. (2025) · Advanced Exercise and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.aehs.2025.03.001 · Cited by 2
Gerards, M. H. G., Verburg, A. C., Slotegraaf, A. I., van Heerde, R., de Bie, R. A., van der Wees, P. J., Lenssen, A. F., Hoogeboom, T. J., Agasi-Idenburg, C. S., Cup, E. H. C., et al. (2025) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaf065 · Cited by 1
Benefits of Patisiran on Functional Capacity in ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis
Berk, J. L., Lairez, O., Schwartzmann, P. V., Bender, S. D., White, M. T., Jay, P. Y., Danese, D., & Witteles, R. M. (2025) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101876 · Cited by 1
López-Espinoza, T., Sacomori, C., Gutiérrez-Silva, L., Peña-Espinoza, M., Roldán, P., & Araya-Castro, P. (2025) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09702-4 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, the functional tests had to be adapted to the patient’s room, limiting the application of other standardized tests, e.g., the six-minute walk test, for which more reference values are available for patients with cancer [35].”
Pedersen, M. B., Fonvig, C. E., Arndt, K. B., Hansen, G. M., Nielsen, J. L., Aagaard, P., Jørgensen, K. J., & Holsgaard‐Larsen, A. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2531302 · Cited by 1
“…with conventional therapy control conditions, BwS gait training improved walking capacity 29.7 m (95% ci, 9.9; 48.5), with low-certainty evidence, which falls within the published MciD of 14–30.5 m [36], although the lower confidence limit fell below this range (table 2 and Appendix D.1.3).”
InfluentialChen, G., Feng, B., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Wang, B., Chen, S., Peng, J., & Wang, Y. (2025) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01276-2 · Cited by 1
“A significant change in cardiorespiratory fitness was defined as an improvement or deterioration of the 6MWD from baseline by 20 m [43, 44].”
Bray, N. W., Pieruccini‐Faria, F., Witt, S. T., Bartha, R., Nagamatsu, L. S., Almeida, Q. J., Liu-Ambrose, T. Y. L., Middleton, L. E., Bherer, L., & Montero‐Odasso, M. (2025) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000003829 · Cited by 1
Владимирович, В. Д., Wu, S., Kostera‐Pruszczyk, A., Chae, J., Gulati, S., Shin, J.-H., Lorentzos, M., Cairns, A. G., Jong, Y., Komaki, H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.57264/cer-2024-0238 · Cited by 1
“An approximately 5% persistent worsening in 6MWD has also been established as a threshold for clinically meaningful progression for a range of similar diseases with compromised neuromuscular and pulmonary function [6 , 16 , 20] .”
Puchades, M. J., Todolí, J. C., Núñez, J. E., Giménez-Civera, E., Gonzales, B., Montomoli, M., de la Espriella, R., González-Rico, M., Torregrosa, I., Peña, C. J., et al. (2025) · Nefrología · doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2025.501418 · Cited by 1
Inspiratory and Expiratory Muscle Strength Training for Persistent Dyspnea in Post-COVID-19
Morgan, S. P., Thomas, B., Rodriguez, C. S., Johnson, A. R., & Beckie, T. M. (2025) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/10547738251371244 · Cited by 1
“This exceeds the minimum clinically important difference established for the 6MWT for individuals with pathology, which ranges from 14 to 30.5 m (Bohannon & Crouch, 2017).”
InfluentialLiu, Y., Yu, L. J., Cao, H., Yang, Z., Wang, Z., Qiao, S., Shen, X., Ye, Y., & Xie, J. (2025) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09994-6 · Cited by 1
“In terms of exercise capacity, although 6MWD increased in message framing groups at T1 compared to NFM (GFM: 11.55 m; LFM: 6.48 m; NFM: 6.38 m), intergroup changes did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID: 22–42 m) [56–58].”
InfluentialVenkatapen, D., Caty, G. D., Froidure, A., Nana, F. A., & Reychler, G. (2025) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108426 · Cited by 1
Six-minute walk test and pulmonary function in ambulatory children with early-onset scoliosis
Zapata, K. A., Johnston, C. E., Thompson, T., Shelton, H. B., Jo, C., & McIntosh, A. L. (2025) · Spine Deformity · doi:10.1007/s43390-025-01202-z · Cited by 1
“A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 14.0–30.5 m was used based on a previous study [17].”
InfluentialDermatomyositis masking late onset Pompe disease in a patient with proximal muscle weakness
Keritam, O., Haas, P., Klotz, S., Kastrati, K., Krenn, M., Wagner, M., Hasenoehrl, T., Weng, R., Zulehner, G., Kasprian, G. J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.1177/22143602251385048 · Cited by 1
“14”
The six-minute walk test prognostic value in heart failure patients
Tokmachev, R. E., Budnevsky, A. V., Васильевна, К. А., Kravchenko, A. Y., Natarov, A., Simion, A. Y., & Kostrykina, M. S. (2025) · Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council · doi:10.21518/ms2025-346 · Cited by 1
Moura, M., Ferreira, M. L. V., Speri, F. D., Alves, L. C. M., Rostirola, J. V. C., de Campos, E. D., & Conceição, M. S. (2025) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1700510 · Cited by 1
Kim, E., Park, Y., Kim, C., Park, D., Kang, Y. A., & Jeon, J. Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-28839-0 · Cited by 1
“The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6-min walk test varies from 14 to 54 m across different populations, with chronic respiratory diseases specifically showing MCIDs of 25–33 m 37,38 .”
Can sacubitril/valsartan enhance sleep quality and reduce daytime dysfunction in HFrEF patients?
Dereli, S., & Şeker, O. O. (2025) · Sleep And Breathing · doi:10.1007/s11325-025-03553-3 · Cited by 1
“A variation exceeding 50 m in walking distance is deemed to have clini - cal significance, reflecting a meaningful change in patient condition [ 16].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohannon, R. W., & Crouch, R.
- Affiliations
- Campbell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crouch, Rebecca
- ORCID
- Bohannon, Richard W.
- Venue
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-381
- ISSN
- 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2753
- OpenAlex
- W2517085950
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- minimal clinically important difference, 6-minute walk test, exercise capacity, functional capacity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, interstitial lung disease, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, fear of falling, ROC curve
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Walk Test, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Bronchiectasis, Coronary Artery Disease, Fear, Humans, Quality of Life, ROC Curve, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review