The application of Lean Six Sigma methodology to reduce the risk of healthcare–associated infections in surgery departments
Abstract
Rationale: Nowadays, the monitoring and prevention of healthcare–associated infections (HAIs) is a priority for the healthcare sector. Aims and objectives: In this article, we report on the application of the Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology to reduce the number of patients affected by sentinel bacterial infections who are at risk of HAI. Methods: The LSS methodology was applied in the general surgery department by using a multidisciplinary team of both physicians and academics. Data on more than 20 000 patients who underwent a wide range of surgical procedures between January 2011 and December 2014 were collected to conduct the study using the departmental information system. The most prevalent sentinel bacteria were determined among the infected patients. The preintervention (January 2011 to December 2012) and postintervention (January 2013 to December 2014) phases were compared to analyze the effects of the methodology implemented. The methodology allowed the identification of variables that influenced the risk of HAIs and the implementation of corrective actions to improve the care process, thereby reducing the percentage of infected patients. Results: The improved process resulted in a 20% reduction in the average number of hospitalization days between preintervention and control phases, and a decrease in the mean (SD) number of days of hospitalization amounted to 36 (15.68), with a data distribution around 3 σ. The LSS is a helpful strategy that ensures a significant decrease in the number of HAIs in patients undergoing surgical interventions. The implementation of this intervention in the general surgery departments resulted in a significant reduction in both the number of hospitalization days and the number of patients affected by HAIs. Conclusions: This approach, together with other tools for reducing the risk of infection (surveillance, epidemiological guidelines, and training of healthcare personnel), could be applied to redesign and improve a wide range of healthcare processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizational and cultural changes result in direct impacts on clinical aspect of patients, such as infections rate reduction and shorter treatment time.
“Organizational and cultural changes result in direct impacts on clinical aspect of patients. For this matter, we can highlight, for instance, effects such as “infections rate reduction” and “shorter treatment time” [31,55,63].”
From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
Interventions included team training.
“team training [24,25,41,54,55]”
From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
With the use of DMAIC, the most prominent results were decreased lead time, reduced length of stay and decreased costs.
“with the use of DMAIC, the ones that stood out the most were decreased lead time, reduced length of stay and decreased costs [21,30,38,48,55].”
From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving performances of the knee replacement surgery process by applying DMAIC principles
Improta, G., Balato, G., Romano, M., Ponsiglione, A. M., Raiola, E., Russo, M. A., Cuccaro, P., Santillo, L. C., & Cesarelli, M. (2017) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12810 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationLean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review.
de Barros, L. B., Bassi, L. D. C., Caldas, L. P., Sarantopoulos, A., Zeferino, E. B. B., Minatogawa, V., & Gasparino, R. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18147389 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“For this matter, we can highlight, for instance, effects such as “infections rate reduction” and “shorter treatment time” [31,55,63].”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Montella, E., Di Cicco, M. V., Ferraro, A., Centobelli, P., Raiola, E., Triassi, M., & Improta, G.
- Affiliations
- Federico II University Hospital (IT)
- Department of Public Health University “Federico II” of Naples Naples Italy
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Improta, Giovanni
- Venue
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 530-539
- ISSN
- 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2753
- OpenAlex
- W2551979481
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
- Keywords
- Lean Six Sigma, nosocomial infections, surgical site infection, general surgery, hospital infection control, length of hospital stay, infection surveillance, process improvement
- MeSH terms
- Bacterial Infections, Cross Infection, Humans, Inservice Training, Length of Stay, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Total Quality Management, Sentinel Surveillance, Guideline Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review