Cited by 105Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationQuality and Supply Management

Improving performances of the knee replacement surgery process by applying DMAIC principles

Open access
Improta, Giovanni, Balato, Giovanni, Romano, Maria, Ponsiglione, Alfonso Maria, Raiola, Eliana, Russo, Mario Alessandro, Cuccaro, Patrizia, Santillo, Liberatina Carmela +1 more·2017·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The work is a part of a project about the application of the Lean Six Sigma to improve health care processes. A previously published work regarding the hip replacement surgery has shown promising results. Here, we propose an application of the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control) cycle to improve quality and reduce costs related to the prosthetic knee replacement surgery by decreasing patients' length of hospital stay (LOS) Methods: The DMAIC cycle has been adopted to decrease the patients' LOS. The University Hospital “Federico II” of Naples, one of the most important university hospitals in Southern Italy, participated in this study. Data on 148 patients who underwent prosthetic knee replacement between 2010 and 2013 were used. Process mapping, statistical measures, brainstorming activities, and comparative analysis were performed to identify factors influencing LOS and improvement strategies. Results: The study allowed the identification of variables influencing the prolongation of the LOS and the implementation of corrective actions to improve the process of care. The adopted actions reduced the LOS by 42%, from a mean value of 14.2 to 8.3 days (standard deviation also decreased from 5.2 to 2.3 days). Conclusions: The DMAIC approach has proven to be a helpful strategy ensuring a significant decreasing of the LOS. Furthermore, through its implementation, a significant reduction of the average costs of hospital stay can be achieved. Such a versatile approach could be applied to improve a wide range of health care processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jep.12810

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economic benefits of lean healthcare include increase in revenue and costs reduction.

    “there are effects of “increase in revenue” and “costs reduction” [21,38,48].”

    From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Discussion reports that applying DMAIC to the knee-replacement pathway reduced costs, with estimated annual savings of more than €260,000. Our copy does not report an increase in revenue, so it supports only the cost-reduction part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • With the use of DMAIC, the most prominent results were decreased lead time, reduced length of stay and decreased costs.

    “with the use of DMAIC, the ones that stood out the most were decreased lead time, reduced length of stay and decreased costs [21,30,38,48,55].”

    From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results report a 42% reduction in length of stay, and the Abstract Conclusions and Discussion describe reduced hospital-stay costs. The paper does not report a separate decrease in lead time; its measured time outcome is length of stay. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interventions included review of work processes.

    “review of work processes [38,46,47,48,49]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [8]Converso G, De Carlini R, Santillo LC, Improta G. Project management implementation for healthcare activities organization. Paper presented at: Advances in Computer Science, Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS European Computing Conference (ECC '12) 2012; Prague, Czech Republic.
  2. [11]Improta G, De Rosa G, Verdoliva C, et al. Appropriate indicators to evaluate the technology managed by the functional direction GAT of AORN. “A. Cardarelli” in Naples. Paper presented at: 15th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Science (ICIEMS) 2013.
  3. [12]Improta G, Parente G, Triassi M, et al. Evaluation of a set of indicators devoted to the service of health education: the case of the Biotechnology Centre of the AORN Hospital “A. Cardarelli” in Naples. Paper presented at: 15th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Science (ICIEMS) 2013.
  4. [18]Womack JP. Going Lean in Health Care. Cambridge, MA: IHI Innovation Series white paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2005.
  5. [19]Improta G, Balato G, Romano M, et al. Lean Six Sigma: a new approach to the management of patients undergoing prosthetic hip replacement surgery. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 21(4): 662‐ 672. 25958776
  6. [20]Improta G, Giangrande P, Montella E, et al. An appropriate methodology for hospital management: Six Sigma at AOU “Federico II” of Naples. Paper presented at: 15th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Science (ICIEMS)2013.
  7. [33]Cimmino MA, Salaffi F, Olivieri I, et al. Pain patterns in Italian patients with osteoarthritis: preliminary results of the MIDA Study. Reumatismo. 2004; 56(4): 253‐ 261. 15643480

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Improta, G., Balato, G., Romano, M., Ponsiglione, A. M., Raiola, E., Russo, M. A., Cuccaro, P., Santillo, L. C., & Cesarelli, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
Corresponding author
Improta, Giovanni
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-26
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1401-1407
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W2758975722
Cited by
105
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
knee arthroplasty, length of hospital stay, DMAIC, Lean Six Sigma, process improvement, hospital costs, surgical process, process mapping, healthcare quality improvement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Italy, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Efficiency, Organizational, Total Quality Management, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review