Cited by 120Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis

A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN)

Facenda, Júlia Cadorim, Borba, Marcia, Corazza, Pedro Henrique·2018·Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ceramics and composites are the most used materials for dental application. Recently, the characteristics of both were combined on the called "polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network" (PICN). The aim of this review is to report the behavior of PICN, comparing the findings that may support the correct clinical application. OVERVIEW: The PICN material is a structure with a sintered ceramic matrix infiltrated with a polymer matrix. Studies evaluated this material microstructure and composition, mechanical properties and adhesive behavior. The most cited mechanical properties are flexural strength, compressive strength, elastic modulus, Weibull modulus, hardness, fracture toughness and fatigue resistance. Most studies compared PICN with feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, lithium silicate, zirconia-reinforced glass-ceramic, leucite reinforced glass-ceramic, polycrystalline alumina and zirconia. Other studies evaluated a similar material (a nanoceramic resin). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The mechanical properties of the PICN are equivalent to the properties of nanoceramic resins, lower to lithium disilicate glass ceramic and superior to feldspathic porcelain. Yet, the findings suggest a highly resistant material to degradation at low loads (close to physiological situation) when cemented on a substrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jerd.12370

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The beneficial effects of the polymer on ductility, toughness, and elongation have been extensively validated.

    “The beneficial effects of the polymer on ductility, toughness, and elongation have been extensively validated [122,190, 191].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Facenda, J. C., Borba, M., & Corazza, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR)
  • Post‐graduation Program in Dentistry, Dental School University of Passo Fundo Passo Fundo Brazil
Corresponding author
Corazza, Pedro Henrique
Venue
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-05
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
281-286
ISSN
  • 1496-4155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8240
OpenAlex
W2793345786
Cited by
120
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
Keywords
polymer-infiltrated ceramic network, dental ceramics, dental composites, mechanical properties, flexural strength, compressive strength, fracture toughness, fatigue resistance, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, feldspathic porcelain, leucite glass-ceramic, microstructure, clinical application
MeSH terms
Ceramics, Dental Porcelain, Dental Stress Analysis, Materials Testing, Polymers, Surface Properties, Zirconium, Silicates, Elastic Modulus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review