Cited by 41Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFood and Agricultural Sciences

Optimizing the Homogenizer‐Assisted Extraction (HAE) of Total Phenolic Compounds from Banana Peel

Pereira, Gustavo Araujo, Molina, Gustavo, Arruda, Henrique Silvano, Pastore, Glaucia Maria·2017·Journal of Food Process Engineering

Abstract

Homogenizer‐assisted extraction (HAE) was employed in the recovery of total phenolic compounds (TPC) from banana peel. The effects of ethanol concentration (20–70%, v/v, EC) and the solid–solvent ratio (2.5–7.5%, w/v, SSR) on the TPC extraction from banana peel were evaluated using response surface methodology. The best TPC extraction conditions from banana peel were defined as ethanol concentration of 54% (v/v) and solid–solvent ratio of 7.5% (w/v). The HAE in optimum conditions was able to extract a high TPC content (2.44 g GAE/100 g dw) from banana peel with just 30 s of extraction. In addition, the extract showed high antioxidant activity in the different assays used (DPPH IC 50, TEAC and T‐ORAC FL). HAE can be employed in the safe, fast and low environmental impact extraction of antioxidant compounds from plant material. Furthermore, banana peels can be considered as a renewable and low‐cost source of antioxidant compounds. Practical Applications: Extraction of antioxidants from banana peel using HAE presents more potential than traditional extraction methods, due to a lot of decrease of extraction time (30 s), low energy expenditure as the system is not heated and also the use of GRAS solvent (water : ethanol). The banana peel extract obtained in optimal conditions presents high potential, for example, it can be applied as preservatives in the food and beverage, besides others uses in pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. The banana peel is a cheap plant material and available throughout the year; therefore, it is an excellent raw material for the extraction of natural compounds. The use of banana peel to obtain antioxidant extracts is a practical alternative for increasing the value of this by‐product.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpe.12438

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, G. A., Molina, G., Arruda, H. S., & Pastore, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Bioflavors and Bioactive Compounds Laboratory Department of Food Science, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas Campinas São Paulo Brazil
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Venue
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-24
Volume
40
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0145-8876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4530
OpenAlex
W2469793791
Cited by
41
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Process Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
banana peel, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, ethanol concentration, solid-to-solvent ratio, extraction optimization, food by-product valorization, natural antioxidants, food preservatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review