The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of pretreatments and drying on shrinkage and rehydration kinetics of ginger (Zingiber officinale)
Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to understand the effect of drying temperature (40, 50, and 60°C) and pretreatments such as conventional blanching (60°C for 5 min) (CB), microwave‐assisted blanching (430 W for 2 min) (MAB), and ultrasound (amplitude: 60%; time: 15 min) (US) conditions on shrinkage and rehydration behavior of ginger slices. In all treatment combinations, the volumetric shrinkage of ginger slices was well described by the quadratic equation as a function of moisture content. From the experimental study, it was found that the ginger slices pretreated with US had shown the lowest percentage of shrinkage in length (6–7%), breadth (41–43%), and volume (64–65%) at three different drying temperatures, following that control (7–10%, 44–45%, and 66–71%), CB (17–19%, 55–57%, and 80–81%), and MAB (16–23%, 46–53%, and 76–80%) slices have higher volumetric shrinkage. In rehydration, the Peleg's, exponential, and Vega‐Galvez models comparatively well describe the rehydration kinetics of ginger slices as a function of rehydration time. The US treated samples dried at 60°C have the higher rehydration ratio (RR) of 4.886 at 35°C rehydration temperature. The relationship between the Peleg's kinetic rates constant (k1), and various treatment conditions was estimated. The rehydration ratio of ginger slices lies between 2.5 and 5. Compared to other pretreatments and drying conditions, US treated samples dried at 60°C have better quality in terms of volumetric shrinkage and rehydration ratio. Practical Applications: When it comes to the preservation of fresh agricultural products, drying is the most common method. Studying dried product quality using physical criteria such as shrinkage and rehydration helps to understand the textural and physical nature of foods. This study will aid in selecting better process parameters to obtain higher‐quality products and information on ginger shrinkage and rehydration behavior. The shrinkage and rehydration behavior of ginger slices have been satisfactorily described using mathematical models. A quadratic equation best describes the shrinkage behavior. The rehydration property of ginger slices is well represented by the Peleg's, exponential, and Vega‐Galvez models. The ginger slices pretreated with US treatment undergone fewer shrinkage changes and have higher water uptake in a minimum rehydration period. They can be used in ready to cook products.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hydrothermal, thermal, microwave, radiofrequency, ultrasound, and others have been used as pretreatments in overcoming or accelerating the timeframe s of drying (Buvaneswaran et al., 2022).”
From Valorization of Pomegranate and Banana By-products into Value-added Products: Influence on Physicochemical, Rheological, and Consumer Attributes (2025) · cites this paper as Buvaneswaran et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Modelling shrinkage during convective drying of food materials: a review
Mayor, L., & Sereno, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0260-8774(03)00144-4 · Cited by 780
Recent developments and trends in thermal blanching – A comprehensive review
Xiao, H.-W., Pan, Z., Deng, L.-Z., El-Mashad, H. M., Yang, X.-H., Mujumdar, A. S., Gao, Z.-J., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Information Processing in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2017.02.001 · Cited by 429
Rehydration kinetics of dehydrated products
Krokida, M. K., & Marinos-Kouris, D. (2003) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0260-8774(02)00214-5 · Cited by 372
Aral, S., & Beşe, A. V. (2016) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.128 · Cited by 278
Shrinkage of Food Materials During Drying: Current Status and Challenges
Mahiuddin, M., Khan, M. I. H., Kumar, C., Rahman, M. M., & Karim, A. (2018) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12375 · Cited by 261
Ultrasound pre-treatment enhances the carrot drying and rehydration
Ricce, C., Rojas, M. L., Miano, A. C., Siche, R., & Augusto, P. E. D. (2016) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.030 · Cited by 176
Ghafoor, K., Al Juhaimi, F., Özcan, M. M., Uslu, N., Babiker, E. E., & Mohamed Ahmed, I. A. (2020) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109354 · Cited by 174
Morchella esculenta (morel) rehydration process modelling
García-Pascual, P., Sanjuán, N., Melis, R., & Mulet, A. (2006) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.12.014 · Cited by 164
Mayor, L., Moreira, R., & Sereno, A. M. (2010) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.031 · Cited by 116
Osae, R., Essilfie, G. L., Alolga, R. N., Akaba, S., Song, X., Owusu‐Ansah, P., & Zhou, C. (2020) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.10284 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Pandiselvam, R., Aydar, A. Y., Kutlu, N., Aslam, R., Sahni, P., Mitharwal, S., Gavahian, M., Kumar, M., Raposo, A., Yoo, S., et al. (2022) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106261 · Cited by 140
Effect of ultrasonication on food bioactive compounds and their bio-accessibility: A review
Meena, L., Gowda, N. A. N., Sunil, C. K., Rawson, A., & Janghu, S. (2023) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105899 · Cited by 59
Self-citationKim, S.-Y., Jeong, U.-C., Ju, H.-I., Jeong, S.-H., & Lee, D. (2023) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2023.103449 · Cited by 37
Effect of ultrasound treatment on white finger millet-based probiotic beverage
Meena, L., Buvaneswaran, M., Byresh, T. S., Sunil, C. K., Rawson, A., & Natarajan, V. (2023) · Measurement Food · doi:10.1016/j.meafoo.2023.100090 · Cited by 29
Self-citationMeena, L., Buvaneswaran, M., Byresh, T. S., Sunil, C. K., Rawson, A., & Venkatachalapathy, N. (2024) · Food Chemistry Advances · doi:10.1016/j.focha.2024.100631 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buvaneswaran, M., Natarajan, V., Sunil, C. K., & Rawson, A.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management - Thanjavur (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Natarajan, Venkatachalapathy
- Venue
- Journal of Food Process Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0145-8876 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-4530
- OpenAlex
- W4206752602
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Food Process Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Keywords
- ginger, volume shrinkage, rehydration kinetics, ultrasonic pretreatment, drying temperature, rehydration ratio, Peleg model, exponential model, moisture content, rehydration temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of pretreatments and drying on shrinkage and rehydration kinetics of ginger (Zingiber officinale). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jfpe.13972
- The paper
- Buvaneswaran, M., Natarajan, V., Sunil, C. K., & Rawson, A. (2022). Effect of pretreatments and drying on shrinkage and rehydration kinetics of ginger (Zingiber officinale). Journal of Food Process Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.