Family dynamics during emerging adulthood: reviewing, integrating, and challenging the field
Abstract
The present study seeks to review and integrate evidence from the empirical literature on family dynamics during the emerging adulthood years. Fifty studies were analyzed, resulting in the following research findings: (a) Emerging adulthood is a period of change in family relationships; (b) family systems anchor both individual and family development during emerging adulthood years; (c) reports of family dynamics by parents and children suggest intergenerational differences; (d) feeling “in between” is not only a characteristic of individuals but also a family experience; and (e) individual‐ and family‐level sociodemographic indicators shape family dynamics in emerging adulthood. The main challenges for future research entail considering the family as the unit of analysis by collecting data from multiple family members, conducting longitudinal studies to better understand changes in family relationships across emerging adulthood, and focusing on family relationships beyond the parent–child dyad.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The metaphorical scaffolding around the emerging adult is crucial for safe and successful navigation of this developmental phase, but it constantly evolves.
“The metaphorical scaffolding around the emerging adult is crucial for the safe and successful navigation of this developmental phase, but it constantly evolves. 153,154”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [153]
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · see citing works
Identity in Emerging Adulthood: Reviewing the Field and Looking Forward
Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Luyckx, K., Meca, A., & Ritchie, R. A. (2013) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696813479781 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health
McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Dalal, N., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Blakemore, S.-J., Browne, V., Dooley, B., Hickie, I. B., Jones, P. B., McDaid, D., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00163-9 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oliveira, C., Fonseca, G., Sotero, L., Crespo, C., & Relvas, A. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Oliveira, Carolina
- Venue
- Journal of Family Theory & Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-08-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 350-367
- ISSN
- 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-2589
- OpenAlex
- W3082156225
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Theory & Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- emerging adulthood, family dynamics, family relationships, intergenerational differences, family systems, parent-child relationship, family development, sociodemographic factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review