The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background and Aim: The rise in incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) in the USA over the last four decades has been well documented; however, data on trends in long‐term survival and impact on modern therapies associated with survival are lacking. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried to identify patients with confirmed EC. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine independent mortality factors. Results: Of 93 167 patients diagnosed with EC between 1973 and 2009, 49% had a histologic diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There was an increase (almost double) in the proportion of patients with adenocarcinoma from the 1970s to 2000s (n = 2,350; 35% to n = 32,212; 61%, P < 0.001). Surgery was performed for localized disease in a majority of EC regardless of type (n = 46 683; 89%). Use of surgical treatment increased significantly over the study period (49% to 64%, P < 0.001). There was also an increase in overall median survival (6 months versus 10 months, P < 0.001) and 5‐year survival rate (9% to 22%, P < 0.001). Median survival increased consistently for EAC and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) until the 1990s. After this period, median survival of EAC continued to increase more rapidly while SCC remained relatively stable. Conclusion: A significant survival improvement in esophageal cancer was seen from 1973 to 2009, largely because of earlier detection at a curative stage and greater utilization of treatment modalities (especially surgery). Despite the rising prevalence, patients with EAC have better long‐term survival outcomes than those SCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 54,679
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21254 · Cited by 11,853
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20138 · Cited by 10,679
Enzinger, P. C., & Mayer, R. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra035010 · Cited by 2,509
Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia
Blot, W. J. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.265.10.1287 · Cited by 2,354
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States
Devesa, S. S., Blot, W. J., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2049::aid-cncr1>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 2,115
Updated Guidelines 2008 for the Diagnosis, Surveillance and Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus
Wang, K. K., & Sampliner, R. E. (2008) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01835.x · Cited by 2,014
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Musiol, G. (1997) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(97)84760-3 · Cited by 1,960
Spiess, P. E., Lee, A. K., Leibovici, D., Wang, X., Do, K., & Pisters, L. L. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21979 · Cited by 1,930
Cited by
The Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Coleman, H. G., Xie, S.-H., & Lagergren, J. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.046 · Cited by 549
Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial
Jankowski, J. A. Z., de Caestecker, J., Love, S. B., Reilly, G., Watson, P., Sanders, S., Ang, Y., Morris, D., Bhandari, P., Brooks, C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31388-6 · Cited by 266
Kelly, R. J., Ansari, A. M., Miyashita, T., Zahurak, M., Lay, F., Ahmed, A. K., Born, L. J., Pezhouh, M. K., Salimian, K. J., Ng, C., et al. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003455 · Cited by 22
Dighe, S. G., Yan, L., Mukherjee, S., McGillicuddy, C. S., Hulme, K. L., Hochwald, S. N., Yendamuri, S., Bain, A. J., Robillard, K. T., Moysich, K. B., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13184653 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Njei, B., McCarty, T. R., & Birk, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1141-1146
- ISSN
- 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1746
- OpenAlex
- W2230150749
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 24.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgh.13289
- The paper
- Njei, B., McCarty, T. R., & Birk, J. W. (2016). Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.